skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Did you mean Sherman?

Your query sherman returned 24 results.

1000 POSTAL SERVICE V. FLAMINGO INDUSTRIES (USA) LTD.
[Syllabus]
The federal antitrust laws apply to a person, which is defined to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of * * * the United States. 15 U.S.C.7 (sherman Act), 12 (a) (Clayton Act). The question presented is whether the United States Postal Service is a person amenable to suit under the antitrust laws.
1000 F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD. V. EMPAGRAN S.A.
[Syllabus]
(1) Whether under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 (FTAIA), 15 U.S.C. § 6a, the Sherman Act applies to claims of foreign plaintiffs whose injuries do not arise from the effects of antitrust violations on United States commerce? (2) Whether such foreign plaintiffs lack antitrust standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15(a)?
864
[Syllabus]
666
[Syllabus]
666 LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC. V.PSKS, INC.
[Syllabus]
666 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. V. LINKLINECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
[Syllabus]
666 STATE OIL CO. V. KHAN, 522 U.S. 3 (1997)
[Syllabus]
526 BELL ATLANTIC CORP. V. TWOMBLY
[Syllabus]
526 LOS ANGELES COUNTY V. HUMPHRIES
[Syllabus]
526 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. V. LAW OFFICESOF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP
[Syllabus]
1. Whether allegations of inadequacies in a monopolist's affirmative assistance to its rivals, including resellers—as newly provided by incumbent local telephone companies under the Telecommunications Act of 1996—state a claim for unlawful unilateral predatory conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act 2. Whether antitrust and Communications Act standing extends to indirect purchasers, I.e., the customers of the defendant's customer, asserting injuries wholly derivative of the direct customer's injury, even when invoking only the direct customer's legal rights.
526
[Syllabus]
526 AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC. V. NATIONALFOOTBALL LEAGUE
[Syllabus]
526
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]
333 NYNEX CORP. V. DISCON, INC.
[Syllabus]
333 BROWN V. PRO FOOTBALL, INC.., 518 U.S. 231 (1996)
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]
333 WEYERHAEUSER CO. V. ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOODLUMBER CO.
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]
333 WHITFIELD V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
333
[Syllabus]