skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query taxation returned 66 results.

1000 ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC. V. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAXATION, 504 U.S. 768 (1992).
[Syllabus]
1000
[Syllabus]
974
[Syllabus]
895 DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF MO. V. COBANK ACB
[Syllabus]
Does 12 U.S.C. Section 2134 authorize states to tax the income of the National Bank for Cooperatives, a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States?""."
895 ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC. V. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAXATION, 504 U.S. 768 (1992).
[Syllabus]
790 OKLAHOMA TAX COMM'N V. JEFFERSON LINES, 514 U.S. 175 (1995).
[Syllabus]
747
[Syllabus]
700 LEVIN V. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.
[Syllabus]
700
[Syllabus]
700 UNITED STATES V. CLEVELAND INDIANSBASEBALL CO.
[Syllabus]
Back wages are subject to FICA and FUTA taxes by reference to the year the wages are in fact paid.
646 CASS COUNTY V. LEECH LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, 524 U.S. 103 (1998)
[Syllabus]
646
[Syllabus]
646
[Syllabus]
577 CITY OF SHERRILL V. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF N. Y.
[Syllabus]
577
[Syllabus]
577 ARKANSAS V. FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, 520 U.S. 821 (1997)
[Syllabus]
577 JEFFERSON COUNTY V. ACKER
[Syllabus]
577 UNITED STATES V. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., 517 U.S. 843 (1996).
[Syllabus]
498 HUNT-WESSON, INC. V. FRANCHISE TAX BD. OF CAL.
[Syllabus]
1. Whether a State may tax constitutionally exempt income under the guise of denying a deduction for expenses in an amount equal to such income when there is no evidence that the expenses relate to the production of the exempt income? 2. Whether a state tax discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause by disallowing an otherwise deductible expense, thereby increasing California taxable income, solely because the corporation is not domiciled in the State or does not have subsidiaries that engage in taxable in-state activity?
498 ARIZONA DEPT. OF REVENUE V. BLAZE CONSTR. CO.
[Syllabus]
498 OKLAHOMA TAX COMM'N V. CHICKASAW NATION, 515 U.S. 450 (1995).
[Syllabus]
393
[Syllabus]
393 BARNETT BANK OF MARION COUNTY, N. A. V. NELSON, FLORIDA INS. COMM'R, 517 U.S. 25 (1996)
[Syllabus]
393 CSX TRANSP., INC. V. GEORGIA STATE BD. OFEQUALIZATION
[Syllabus]
393 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. V. ALABAMA DEPT. OFREVENUE
[Syllabus]
393 UNITED STATES V. HATTER
[Syllabus]
The judgment below is reversed insofar as the Federal Circuit found that the application of Medicare taxes to the salaries of federal judges taking office before 1983 violated the Compensation Clause, but affirmed insofar as that court found the application of Social Security taxes to the salaries of judges taking office before 1984 unconstitutional; a 1984 salary increase received by federal judges did not cure the latter violation.
393
[Syllabus]
393 GITLITZ  V.  COMMISSIONER
[Syllabus]
Whether, in conflict with the holdings of the Third Circuit in United States v. Farley, No 99-3209, F. 3d (3d Cir. 2000) (App. 92) and the Fifth Circuit in CSI Hydrostatic Testers, Inc. and Subs. v. Commissioner, 62 F.3d 136 (5th Cir. 1995), aff'g and adopting the opinion of the Tax Court, 103 T.C. 398 (1994), the Tenth Circuit incorrectly held that tax attributes subject to reduction under 26 U.S.C. 108(b), including the suspended losses of an S corporation shareholder, must be reduced in the year that discharge of indebtedness income, excluded under 26 U.S.C. 108(a), is realized, despite the statutory requirement that all tax attributes, including suspended losses, be adjusted in the succeeding taxable year, and only after the determination of tax for the taxable year, of the discharge."
393 MEADWESTVACO CORP. V. ILLINOIS DEPT. OFREVENUE
[Syllabus]
393 LUNDING V. NEW YORK TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL, 522 U.S. 287 (1998)
[Syllabus]
393 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL ED. AND RESEARCH V.UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
249 YSURSA V. POCATELLO ED. ASSN.
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 WAGNON V. PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION
[Syllabus]
249 FULTON CORP. V. FAULKNER, SECRETARY OF REVENUE OF N. C., 516 U.S. 325 (1996).
[Syllabus]
249 HUMANA INC. V. FORSYTH
[Syllabus]
249 DAVENPORT V. WASHINGTON ED. ASSN.
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 UNITED STATES V. CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING CO.
[Syllabus]
249 PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA TO UNITED NATIONS V.CITY OF NEW YORK
[Syllabus]
249 MONTANA V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, 523 U.S. 696 (1998)
[Syllabus]
249 NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR ARTS V. FINLEY, 524 U.S. 569 (1998)
[Syllabus]
249 ROUSEY V. JACOWAY
[Syllabus]
249 COMMISSIONER V. BANKS
[Syllabus]
249 PLAINS COMMERCE BANK V. LONG FAMILY LAND &CATTLE CO.
[Syllabus]
249 ENGQUIST V. OREGON DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
[Syllabus]
249 UNITED STATES V. CRAFT
[Syllabus]
Michigan law gives a tenant by the entirety individual rights in the estate sufficient to constitute "property" or "rights to property" to which a federal tax lien may attach under 26 U. S. C. §6321.
249
[Syllabus]
249 ARLINGTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF ED. V.MURPHY
[Syllabus]
249 REYNOLDSVILLE CASKET CO. V. HYDE, 514 U.S. 749 (1995).
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 ATKINSON TRADING CO. V. SHIRLEY
[Syllabus]
The Navajo Nation's imposition of a hotel occupancy tax upon nonmembers on non-Indian fee land within its reservation is invalid.
249 LIMTIACO V. CAMACHO
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 HIBBS V. WINN
[Syllabus]
249 PHILLIPS V. WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, 524 U.S. 156 (1998)
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 ROSENBERGER V. UNIVERSITY OF VA., 515 U.S. 819 (1995).
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 FLORIDA DEPT. OF REVENUE V. PICCADILLYCAFETERIAS, INC.
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 44 LIQUORMART, INC., ET AL. V. RHODE ISLAND ET AL., 517 U.S. 484 (1996).
[Syllabus]
249 PORTLAND GOLF CLUB V. COMMISSIONER, 497 U.S. 154 (1990)
[Syllabus]