skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query title returned 197 results.

Your search has returned a large number of results. You might want to consider using additional terms to narrow it.

1000 JACKSON V. BIRMINGHAM BD. OF ED.
[Syllabus]
988 SPECTOR V. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD.
[Syllabus]
920 RAYMOND B. YATES, M.D., P.C. PROFIT SHARINGPLAN V. HENDON
[Syllabus]
Whether the working owner of a business (here, the sole shareholder of a corporate employer) is precluded from being a "participant" under Section 3(7) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1002(7), in an ERISA plan?
908 GEBSER V. LAGO VISTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST., 524 U.S. 274 (1998)
[Syllabus]
908 BLESSING V. FREESTONE, 520 U.S. 329 (1997)
[Syllabus]
908
[Syllabus]
894 TENNESSEE V. LANE
[Syllabus]
Whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilitites Act of 1990 is a proper exercise of Congress' power under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment and thus validly abrogates state sovereign immunity?
894 FITZGERALD V. BARNSTABLE SCHOOL COMM.
[Syllabus]
879
[Syllabus]
849
[Syllabus]
794 AGOSTINI V. FELTON, 117 S.CT. 1997, 138 L.ED.2D 391 (1997).
[Syllabus]
794 UNITED STATES V. LOCKE
[Syllabus]
Whether regulations adopted by the State of Washington governing staffing and operation of oceangoing oil tankers engaged in coastal and international commerce are preempted to the extent that they conflict with international obligations of the United States and Coast Guard regulations for such tankers promulgated pursuant to federal statutes and international conventions and agreements.
794 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIORUNIV. V.ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
[Syllabus]
794 DAVIS V. MONROE COUNTY BD. OF ED.
[Syllabus]
794 MCCONNELL V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N
[Syllabus]
773 RICCI V. DESTEFANO
[Syllabus]
773 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSN. V. SMITH
[Syllabus]
773 ALASKA V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
752 GRABLE & SONS METAL PRODUCTS, INC. V. DARUEENGINEERING & MFG.
[Syllabus]
752 THOMPSON V. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, LP
[Syllabus]
752 GOMEZ-PEREZ V. POTTER
[Syllabus]
752 ROBINSON V. SHELL OIL CO., 519 U.S. 337 (1997).
[Syllabus]
729 BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. V. ELLERTH, 524 U.S. 742 (1998)
[Syllabus]
729 IDAHO V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
The National Government holds title, in trust for the Coeur d'Alene Tribe, to lands underlying portions of Lake Coeur d'Alene and the St. Joe River.
702
[Syllabus]
702 SULLIVAN V. STROOP, 496 U.S. 478 (1990)
[Syllabus]
702 KOLSTAD V. AMERICAN DENTAL ASSN.
[Syllabus]
702 ALEXANDER V. SANDOVAL
[Syllabus]
There is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
702 PGA TOUR, INC. V. MARTIN
[Syllabus]
Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits petitioner from denying golfer Casey Martin equal access to its golf tours on the basis of a disability that prevents him from walking a golf course; allowing Martin to use a golf cart, despite petitioner's walking requirement, is not a modification that would "fundamentally alter the nature" of petitioner's tours.
702 UNITED STATES V. GEORGIA
[Syllabus]
702 SMITH V. CITY OF JACKSON
[Syllabus]
676 LEDBETTER V. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.
[Syllabus]
676 EDELMAN V. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE
[Syllabus]
An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulation permitting an otherwise timely filer of a charge alleging job discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to verify the charge after the time for filing it has expired is an unassailable interpretation of §706 of that Act and is therefore valid.
676 AT&T CORP. V. HULTEEN
[Syllabus]
676 WEST V. GIBSON
[Syllabus]
644 OLMSTEAD V. L. C.
[Syllabus]
608 ONCALE V. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC., 523 U.S. 75 (1998)
[Syllabus]
608
[Syllabus]
608
[Syllabus]
608 STERN V. MARSHALL
[Syllabus]
608 CBOCS WEST, INC. V. HUMPHRIES
[Syllabus]
608 GROSS V. FBL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
570 REED ELSEVIER, INC. V. MUCHNICK
[Syllabus]
570 FELKER V. TURPIN, WARDEN, 518 U.S. 1051 (1996).
[Syllabus]
570 CALIFORNIA V. DEEP SEA RESEARCH, INC., 523 U.S. 491 (1998)
[Syllabus]
570 DESERT PALACE, INC. V. COSTA
[Syllabus]
1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that direct evidence is not required in Title VII cases to trigger the application of the mixed-motive analysis set out in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins? 2. What are the appropriate standards for lower courts to follow in making a direct evidence determination in mixed-motive cases under Title VII?
570
[Syllabus]
570 PALAZZOLO V. RHODE ISLAND
[Syllabus]
Petitioner's claim that Rhode Island's application of its wetlands regulations took his property without compensation in violation of the Takings Clause is ripe for review and is not barred by his acquisition of title after the regulations' effective date; however, he failed to establish a deprivation of all economic use, for the parcel retains significant development value.
570
[Syllabus]
570
[Syllabus]
526 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT
[Syllabus]
1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
526 PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE V. SUDERS
[Syllabus]
When a hostile work environment created by a supervisor culminates in a constructive discharge, may the employer assert an affirmative defense?
526 BARNES V. GORMAN
[Syllabus]
Punitive damages may not be awarded in private suits brought under §202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and §504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
526 BARNHART V. WALTON
[Syllabus]
The Social Security Administration's interpretations of the Social Security Act provisions that authorize payment of Social Security disability benefits and Supplemental Security Income to individuals who have an "inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable . . . impairment . . . which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months," 42 U. S. C. §423(d)(1)(A); accord, §1382c(a)(3)(A), are lawful.
526 FARAGHER V. CITY OF BOCA RATON, 524 U.S. 775 (1998)
[Syllabus]
526 UNITED STATES V. BEGGERLY, 524 U.S. 38 (1998)
[Syllabus]
526 NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSN. V.BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES
[Syllabus]
526 FARAGHER V. CITY OF BOCA RATON, 524 U.S. 775 (1998)
[Syllabus]
526 BURLINGTON N. & S. F. R. CO. V. WHITE
[Syllabus]
470 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTHSERVS. V. GUARDIANSHIP ESTATE OF KEFFELER
[Syllabus]
Washington State's use of respondent foster children's Social Security benefits to reimburse the State for expenses in caring for respondents did not violate 42 U. S. C. §407(a).
470 WALTERS V. METROPOLITAN EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC., 519 U.S. 202 (1997).
[Syllabus]
470 LEWIS V. CHICAGO
[Syllabus]
470 IDAHO V. COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE OF IDAHO, 117 S.CT. 2028, 138 L.ED.2D 438 (1997).
[Syllabus]
470 LOPEZ V. GONZALES
[Syllabus]
470 ALASKA V. NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, 522 U.S. 520 (1998)
[Syllabus]
470 EEOC V. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.
[Syllabus]
An agreement between an employer and an employee to arbitrate employment-related disputes does not bar the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from pursuing victim-specific judicial relief, such as backpay, reinstatement, and damages, in an action to enforce Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
470
[Syllabus]
470
[Syllabus]
470 HARRIS TRUST AND SAV. BANK V. SALOMONSMITH BARNEY INC.
[Syllabus]
Whether a non-fiduciary party in interest with respect to an employee benefit plan that engages in a prohibited transaction, as defined in Section 406(a) (1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (""ERISA""), 29 U.S.C. 1106(a)(1), with the plan can be sued under ERISA 502(a)(3), 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(3), for ""appropriate equitable relief,"" including restitution."
470 NGUYEN V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
405 UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 117 S.CT. 1888, 138 L.ED.2D 231 (1997).
[Syllabus]
405 CITY OF SHERRILL V. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF N. Y.
[Syllabus]
405 CARTER V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether bank larceny, 18 U.S.C. 2113(b) (Supp.IV 1998), is a lesser included offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. 2113 (a)."
405 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATIONV. MORGAN
[Syllabus]
A plaintiff raising claims of discrete discriminatory or retaliatory acts under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must file his charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within the appropriate 180- or 300-day statutory filing period, but a charge alleging a hostile work environment will not be time barred if all acts constituting the claim are part of the same unlawful practice and at least one act falls within the filing period; in neither instance is a court precluded from applying equitable doctrines that may toll or limit the time period.
405 CRAWFORD V. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OFNASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON CTY.
[Syllabus]
405
[Syllabus]
405 QUALITY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. V. LANZA RESEARCH INT., 523 U.S. 135 (1998)
[Syllabus]
405 GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER
[Syllabus]
1. Does the University of Michigan Law School's use of racial preferences in student admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C> 2000d), or 42 U.S.C. 1981? 2. Should an appellate court required to apply strict scrutiny to governmental race-based preferences review de novo the district court's findings because the fact issues are constitutional?
405 MEACHAM V. KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY
[Syllabus]
405
[Syllabus]
405 WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. DUKES
[Syllabus]
405 SCARBOROUGH V. PRINCIPI
[Syllabus]
Whether a complete application for attorney fees and other expenses under The Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(B), containing all the essential elements, must be filed within thirty days to confer jurisdiction on the court.
405 POLLARD V. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
[Syllabus]
Front pay is not an element of compensatory damages under 42 U. S. C. §1981a and thus is not subject to the damages cap imposed by §1981a(b)(3).
405 EMPIRE HEALTHCHOICE ASSURANCE, INC. V. MCVEIGH
[Syllabus]
320 DOLE FOOD CO. V. PATRICKSON
[Syllabus]
Whether a corporation in which a foreign sovereign controls a majority of the shares indirectly through ownership of the corporation’s ultimate parent may qualify as a foriegn state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunitities Act
320
[Syllabus]
320 CARCIERI V. SALAZAR
[Syllabus]
320 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. V. HOLOWECKI
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320 PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORP. V. THE LTV CORP., 496 U.S. 633 (1990)
[Syllabus]
320 ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA
[Syllabus]
320 SOSSAMON V. TEXAS
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320 RYDER V. UNITED STATES, 515 U.S. 177 (1995).
[Syllabus]
320 BARTNICKI V. VOPPER
[Syllabus]
Respondent news media's disclosure of the contents of an illegally intercepted cell phone conversation about a public issue is protected by the First Amendment.
320 PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS V. YESKEY, 524 U.S. 206 (1998)
[Syllabus]
320 SWIERKIEWICZ V. SOREMA N. A.
[Syllabus]
A complaint in an employment discrimination lawsuit need not contain specific facts establishing a prima facie case of discrimination under the framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U. S. 792, but instead must contain only "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief," Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2).
320 BATES V. UNITED STATES, 522 U.S. 23 (1997)
[Syllabus]
320 SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. V. APCC SERVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
320 WHITMAN V. AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSNS., INC.
[Syllabus]
1. Whether Section 109 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7409, as interpreted by the Environmental protection Agency (EPA) in setting revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone and particulate matter, effects an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. 2. Whether the court of appeals exceeded its jurisdiction by reviewing, as a final agency action that is ripe for review, EPA's preliminary preamble statements on the scope of the agency's authority to implement the revised ""eight-hour"" ozone NAAQS. 3. Whether provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 specifically aimed at achieving the long delayed attainment of the then-existing ozone NAAQS restrict EPA's general authority under other provisions of the CAA to implement a new and more protective ozone NAAQS until the prior standard is attained."
320 GRATZ V. BOLLINGER
[Syllabus]
1. Does the University of Michigan's use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.2000d), or 42 U.S.C. 1981?
320 ALMENDAREZ-TORRES V. U.S., 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
[Syllabus]
320 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES, LTD. V. TSUI YUAN TSENG
[Syllabus]
320 STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. V. FLOR-IDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320
[Syllabus]
320 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIV. OF ALA.V. GARRETT
[Syllabus]
1. Whether the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars suits by private citizens in federal court under the Americans with Disabilities Act against non-consenting states. 2. Whether the Eleventh Amendment bars suits in federal court by private citizens under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 against non-consenting states."
320 MORRISON V. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD.
[Syllabus]
202 BAKER BY THOMAS V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., 522 U.S. 222 (1998)
[Syllabus]
202 CHAMBERS V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 GONZALES V. RAICH
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 MURPHY V. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
[Syllabus]
202 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT V. RUCKER
[Syllabus]
Title 42 U. S. C. §1437d(l)(6)'s plain language unambiguously requires public housing lease terms that give local authorities the discretion to terminate the lease of a tenant when a member of the tenant's household or a guest engages in drug-related activity, regardless of whether the tenant knew, or should have known, of that activity.
202
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 FLORIDA V. THOMAS
[Syllabus]
Because the judgment below was not "[f]inal" within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. §1257(a), this Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the question on which certiorari was granted.
202 VADEN V. DISCOVER BANK
[Syllabus]
202 ENGINE MFRS. ASSN. V. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITYMANAGEMENT DIST.
[Syllabus]
Whether local government regulations prohibiting the purchase of new motor vehicles with specified emission characteristics--which are otherwise approved for sale by state and federal regulators--are preempted by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.
202
[Syllabus]
202 SCHWAB V. REILLY
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING CO.
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA TO UNITED NATIONS V.CITY OF NEW YORK
[Syllabus]
202 DEGEN V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 820 (1996).
[Syllabus]
202 BANK ONE CHICAGO, N. A. V. MIDWEST BANK & TRUST CO., 516 U.S. 264 (1996).
[Syllabus]
202 LEOCAL V. ASHCROFT
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. WILLIAMS, 514 U.S. 527 (1995).
[Syllabus]
202 BECKER V. MONTGOMERY
[Syllabus]
When a party files a timely notice of appeal in federal district court, the failure to sign the notice does not require the court of appeals to dismiss the appeal.
202 MINNESOTA V. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS
[Syllabus]
202 SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK CTY. V.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
[Syllabus]
Whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, consistent with the Clean Waters Act and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, may assert jurisdiction over isolated intrastate waters solely because those waters solely because those waters do or potentially could serve as habitat of migratory birds."
202 NIXON V. MISSOURI MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
[Syllabus]
Whether 47 U.S.C. 253(a), which provides that "[n]o State ... regulation ... may prohibit ... the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service," preempts a state law prohibiting political subdivisions of the state from offering telecommunications service to the public?
202
[Syllabus]
202 JINKS V. RICHLAND COUNTY
[Syllabus]
The federal supplemental jurisdiction statute includes a provision, 28 U.S.C. 1367(d), that tolls the period of limitations for supplemental claims while they are pending in federal court and for 30 days after they are dismissed. The question presented is whether the tolling provision invades state sovereignty in violation of the Tenth Amendment and the Necessary and Proper Clause.
202 NIJHAWAN V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
202 GISBRECHT V. BARNHART
[Syllabus]
Title 42 U. S. C. §406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements between Social Security benefits claimants and their counsel within the ceiling set forth in §406(b)(1)(A); instead it instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by those agreements.
202 NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. TASINI
[Syllabus]
Where freelance authors' articles in print periodicals were republished in electronic databases without the authors' consent, the copying was not authorized by the reproduction privilege afforded collective works publishers under §201(c) of the Copyright Act.
202 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE V. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 525 U.S. 316 (1999)
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. CRAFT
[Syllabus]
Michigan law gives a tenant by the entirety individual rights in the estate sufficient to constitute "property" or "rights to property" to which a federal tax lien may attach under 26 U. S. C. §6321.
202 PERDUE V. KENNY A.
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. BOOKER
[Syllabus]
202 LANE V. PENA, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL., 518 U.S. 187 (1996).
[Syllabus]
202 BEACH V. OCWEN FED. BANK, 523 U.S. 410 (1998)
[Syllabus]
202 UTAH V. EVANS
[Syllabus]
The Census Bureau's use of "hot-deck imputation" to fill in gaps in census information and resolve conflicts in the data does not violate 13 U. S. C. §195, which forbids use of "the statistical method known as 'sampling' " in determining population for purposes of apportioning congressional Representatives, and is not inconsistent with the Constitution's Census Clause, which requires an "actual Enumeration" of each State's population.
202 BILSKI V. KAPPOS
[Syllabus]
202 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE
[Syllabus]
202 HAWAII V. OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS
[Syllabus]
202 MITCHELL V. HELMS
[Syllabus]
Whether a program under Chapter 2 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 7301, et seq., which provides federal funds to state and local education agencies to purchase and lend neutral, secular, and nonreligious materials such as computers, software, and library books to public and nonpublic schools for use by the students attending those schools, and which allocates the funds on an equal per-student basis, regardless of the religious or secular character of the schools the students choose to attend, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
202
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 O'CONNOR V. CONSOLIDATED COIN CATERERS CORP., 517 U.S. 308 (1996).
[Syllabus]
202 RIEGEL V. MEDTRONIC, INC.
[Syllabus]
202 SULLIVAN V. FINKELSTEIN, 496 U.S. 617 (1990)
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS V. SCHACHT, 524 U.S. 381 (1998)
[Syllabus]
202 FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
202 GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORP.-ALA. V. RANDOLPH
[Syllabus]
1. Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that an order compelling arbitration and dismissing a lawsuit's underlying claims is a ""final decision with respect to an arbitration"" appealable under 9 U.S.C. 16 (a) (3). 2. Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that arbitration provision that was ""silent"" on the issue of costs and fees was unenforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act because the risk that plaintiff "" be required to bear unknown costs and fees potentially undermined her ability to vindicate statutory rights."
202 SOUTH DAKOTA V. YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, 522 U.S. 329 (1998)
[Syllabus]
202 CUTTER V. WILKINSON
[Syllabus]
202 GREATER NEW ORLEANS BROADCASTING ASSN., INC.V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
202 558 U. S. ____ (2009)
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. V. ROCHE
[Syllabus]
202 HUBBARD V. UNITED STATES, 514 U.S. 695 (1995).
[Syllabus]
202 CASS COUNTY V. LEECH LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, 524 U.S. 103 (1998)
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. NAVAJO NATION
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202
[Syllabus]
202 ASHCROFT V. FREE SPEECH COALITION
[Syllabus]
Provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 prohibiting "any visual depiction" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct," as well as any sexually explicit image "advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression" it depicts a minor engaging in such conduct, are overbroad and therefore violate the First Amendment.
202 MARRAMA V. CITIZENS BANK OF MASS.
[Syllabus]
202 IBP, INC. V. ALVAREZ
[Syllabus]
202 C.I.R. V. ESTATE OF HUBERT, 520 U.S. 93 (1997)
[Syllabus]
202 LINDH V. MURPHY, WARDEN, 117 S.CT. 2059, 138 L.ED.2D 481 (1997).
[Syllabus]
202 RENO V. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, 117 S.CT. 2329, 138 L.ED.2D 874 (1997)
[Syllabus]
202 BEDROC LIMITED, LLC V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether sand and gravel are “valuable minerals” reserved to the United States in land grants issued under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919?
202 MELENDEZ V. UNITED STATES, 117 S. CT. 383, 136 L. ED. 2D 301 (1996).
[Syllabus]
202 VIRGINIA OFFICE FOR PROTECTION AND ADVOCACYV. STEWART
[Syllabus]
202 AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE
[Syllabus]
202 WILKIE V. ROBBINS
[Syllabus]
202 JAMA V. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
[Syllabus]
202 NEVADA DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES V. HIBBS
[Syllabus]
Whether 29 U.S.C. Sec. 2612 (a) (1) (C) exceeds Congress's enforcement authority under Section 5 of the Foruteenth Amendment.
202
[Syllabus]
202 KIMEL V. FLORIDA BD. OF REGENTS
[Syllabus]
Whether the Eleventh Amendment bars a private suit in federal court against a State for violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
202 WOODFORD V. NGO
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. LABONTE, 520 U.S. 751 (1997)
[Syllabus]
202 AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC. V. NATIONALFOOTBALL LEAGUE
[Syllabus]
202 UNITED STATES V. REOGANIZED CF&I FABRICATORS OF UTAH, INC., ET AL., 518 U.S. 213 (1996)
[Syllabus]
202 BRENTWOOD ACADEMY V. TENNESSEE SECONDARYSCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSN.
[Syllabus]
Whether the regulatory conduct of a nominally private secondary school athletic association, which ""establishes and enforces all of the rules by which high school teams and players, at both public and private schools, compete throughout the state of Tennessee,"" Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School athletic Ass'n, 190 F.3rd 705 (6th Cir. 1999) (Merritt, J., dissenting from the denial of petition for rehearing en banc), and whose ""membership consist(s) entirely of institutions located within the same State, many of them public institutions created by the same sovereign, "" NCAA v. Tarkanian, 488 U.S. 179, 193 n. 13 (1988), constitutes state action under the Fourteenth Amendment and under 42 U.S.C. 1983."
202
[Syllabus]