skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query tobacco returned 27 results.

1000 FDA V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.
[Syllabus]
Whether, given FDA's findings, tobacco products are subject to regulation under the Act as ""drugs"" and ""devices.
1000 FDA V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.
[Syllabus]
Whether, given FDA's findings, tobacco products are subject to regulation under the Act as ""drugs"" and ""devices.
692
[Syllabus]
517 ROWE V. NEW HAMPSHIRE MOTOR TRANSP. ASSN.
[Syllabus]
272 WATSON V. PHILIP MORRIS COS.
[Syllabus]
172 UNITED STATES V. CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING CO.
[Syllabus]
172 WEISGRAM  V.  MARLEY CO.
[Syllabus]
1. If the District Court erred in admitting the testimony of the Plaintiffs' experts and the relief to be awarded is a new trial, is the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's decision in conflict with its own precedent and decisions of other United States Courts of Appeal if it granted judgment as a matter of law to Marley Company after excising portions of Plaintiffs' experts' testimony?
172 RUBIN V. COORS BREWING CO., 514 U.S. 476 (1995).
[Syllabus]
172 SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO. V. ALABAMA
[Syllabus]
172 VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC. V. REEDER-SIMCO GMC, INC.
[Syllabus]
172
[Syllabus]
172 NIXON V. MISSOURI MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
[Syllabus]
Whether 47 U.S.C. 253(a), which provides that "[n]o State ... regulation ... may prohibit ... the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service," preempts a state law prohibiting political subdivisions of the state from offering telecommunications service to the public?
172
[Syllabus]
172 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. V. LINKLINECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
[Syllabus]
172 UNITED STATES V. BEAN
[Syllabus]
The absence of an actual denial by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms of a felon's petition for relief from firearms disabilities precludes judicial review under 18 U. S. C. §925(c).
172 REYNOLDSVILLE CASKET CO. V. HYDE, 514 U.S. 749 (1995).
[Syllabus]
172 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE
[Syllabus]
172
[Syllabus]
172 ALTRIA GROUP, INC. V. GOOD
[Syllabus]
172
[Syllabus]
172 GROH V. RAMIREZ
[Syllabus]
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit properly ruled that a law enforcement officer violated clearly established law, and thus was personally liable in damages and not entitled to qualified immunity, when at the time he acted there was no decision by the Supreme Court or any other court so holding, and the only lower court decisions addressing the issue had found the same conduct did not violate the law?
172 MASSACHUSETTS V. EPA
[Syllabus]
172
[Syllabus]
172 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 526 U.S. 86 (1999)
[Syllabus]
172 MILNER V. DEPARTMENT OF NAVY
[Syllabus]
172 LEVIN V. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.
[Syllabus]
172 WEYERHAEUSER CO. V. ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOODLUMBER CO.
[Syllabus]
172 UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES SHOE CORP., 523 U.S. 360 (1998)
[Syllabus]