Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Your query treaties returned 11 results.
![]() |
MEDELLIN V. TEXAS [Syllabus] |
![]() |
SANCHEZ-LLAMAS V. OREGON [Syllabus] |
![]() |
MINNESOTA V. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS [Syllabus] |
![]() |
CITY OF CHICAGO V. INTERN'L COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 522 U.S. 156 (1997) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
UNITED STATES V. LARA [Syllabus] Whether Section 1301, as amended, of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968, 25 U.S.C. 1301, validly restores an Indian tribe's sovereign power to prosecute members of other tribes, such that a federal prosecution following a tribal prosecution for an offense with the same elements is valid under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the 5th Amendment. |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD [Syllabus] |
![]() |
LACKAWANNA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYV. COSS [Syllabus] Title 28 U. S. C. §2254 does not provide a remedy when a state prisoner challenges a current sentence on the ground that it was enhanced based on an allegedly unconstitutional prior conviction for which the petitioner is no longer in custody. |
![]() |
STRATE V. A-1 CONTRACTORS, 520 U.S. 438 (1997). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
MASSACHUSETTS V. EPA [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |







