Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory

Your query trials returned 40 results.

	GASPERINI V. CENTER FOR HUMANITIES, INC., 517 U.S. 1102 (1996). [Syllabus]
	SMITH V. SPISAK [Syllabus]
	SNYDER V. LOUISIANA [Syllabus]
	OREGON V. ICE [Syllabus]
	PENNSYLVANIA BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE V. SCOTT, 524 U.S. 357 (1998) [Syllabus]
	SNYDER V. LOUISIANA [Syllabus]
	WHORTON V. BOCKTING [Syllabus]
	VAN V. GOLDSTEIN [Syllabus]
	O'NEAL V. MCANINCH, 513 U.S. 432 (1995). [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON [Syllabus]
	RUTLEDGE V. UNITED STATES., 517 U.S. 292 (1996). [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	HALBERT V. MICHIGAN [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. TINKLENBERG [Syllabus]
	SHEPARD V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	EXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER [Syllabus]
	BUFORD V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus] Deferential review is appropriate when an appeals court reviews a trial court's Sentencing Guideline determination as to whether an offender's prior convictions were consolidated for sentencing purposes.
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. MARCUS [Syllabus]
	KNOWLES V. MIRZAYANCE [Syllabus]
	M. L. B. V. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996). [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	MERCK KGAA V. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES I, LTD. [Syllabus]
	SKILLING V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus]
	WOOD V. ALLEN [Syllabus]
	KANSAS V. HENDRICKS, 117 S.CT. 2072, 138 L.ED.2D 501 (1997). [Syllabus]
	MARTINEZ V. COURT OF APPEAL OF CAL.,FOURTH APPELLATE DIST. [Syllabus] Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to elect self-representation on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction?
	UNITED STATES V. MARTINEZ-SALAZAR [Syllabus] Whether a defendant is entitled to automatic reversal of his conviction when he uses a peremptory challenge to remove a potential juror whom the district court erroneously failed to remove for cause, and he ultimately exhausts his remaining peremptory challenges.
	BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIORUNIV. V.ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. [Syllabus]
	HARRINGTON V. RICHTER [Syllabus]
	HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD [Syllabus]
	FLORIDA V. THOMAS [Syllabus] Because the judgment below was not "[f]inal" within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. §1257(a), this Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the question on which certiorari was granted.
	BRACY V. GRAMLEY, WARDEN, 520 U.S. 899 (1997). [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]