skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query waters returned 41 results.

1000 RAPANOS V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
826 ALASKA V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
752
[Syllabus]
752 SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK CTY. V.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
[Syllabus]
Whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, consistent with the Clean Waters Act and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, may assert jurisdiction over isolated intrastate waters solely because those waters solely because those waters do or potentially could serve as habitat of migratory birds."
752
[Syllabus]
695 NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK, 523 U.S. 767 (1998)
[Syllabus]
595 UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 117 S.CT. 1888, 138 L.ED.2D 231 (1997).
[Syllabus]
595 CENTRAL GREEN CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the Flood Control Act of 1928 immunizes Respondent from his suit?"
562 SOUTH FLA. WATER MANAGEMENT DIST. V.MICCOSUKEE TRIBE
[Syllabus]
Whether the South Florida Water Management District's longstanding practice of pumping accumulated water from a water collection canal to a water conservation area within the Florida Everglades constitutes an addition of a pollutant from a point source for purposes of Section 402 the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1342, where the water contains a pollutant but the pumping station source itself adds no pollutants to the water being pumped?
486 UNITED STATES V. LOCKE
[Syllabus]
Whether regulations adopted by the State of Washington governing staffing and operation of oceangoing oil tankers engaged in coastal and international commerce are preempted to the extent that they conflict with international obligations of the United States and Coast Guard regulations for such tankers promulgated pursuant to federal statutes and international conventions and agreements.
486 YAMAHA MOTOR CORP., U. S. A., V. CALHOUN, 516 U.S. 199 (1996)
[Syllabus]
486
[Syllabus]
486
[Syllabus]
434 SPECTOR V. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD.
[Syllabus]
374
[Syllabus]
374 NEW JERSEY V. DELAWARE
[Syllabus]
374 WINTER V. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSECOUNCIL, INC.
[Syllabus]
374 IDAHO V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
The National Government holds title, in trust for the Coeur d'Alene Tribe, to lands underlying portions of Lake Coeur d'Alene and the St. Joe River.
374
[Syllabus]
296
[Syllabus]
296 CHAO V. MALLARD BAY DRILLING, INC.
[Syllabus]
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's jurisdiction to issue citations to respondent barge owner was not pre-empted by the Coast Guard under ยง4(b)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970; and the barge in question was a "workplace" covered by the Act.
296 COEUR ALASKA, INC. V. SOUTHEAST ALASKACONSERVATION COUNCIL
[Syllabus]
296
[Syllabus]
187
[Syllabus]
187 VIRGINIA V. MARYLAND
[Syllabus]
187 SOUTH CAROLINA V. NORTH CAROLINA
[Syllabus]
187 ENTERGY CORP. V. RIVERKEEPER, INC.
[Syllabus]
187 IDAHO V. COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE OF IDAHO, 117 S.CT. 2028, 138 L.ED.2D 438 (1997).
[Syllabus]
187 PALAZZOLO V. RHODE ISLAND
[Syllabus]
Petitioner's claim that Rhode Island's application of its wetlands regulations took his property without compensation in violation of the Takings Clause is ripe for review and is not barred by his acquisition of title after the regulations' effective date; however, he failed to establish a deprivation of all economic use, for the parcel retains significant development value.
187 CHANDRIS, INC. V. LATSIS, 515 U.S. 347 (1995).
[Syllabus]
187 SWIERKIEWICZ V. SOREMA N. A.
[Syllabus]
A complaint in an employment discrimination lawsuit need not contain specific facts establishing a prima facie case of discrimination under the framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U. S. 792, but instead must contain only "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief," Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2).
187 STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. V. FLOR-IDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
[Syllabus]
187
[Syllabus]
187 NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MAINE
[Syllabus]
187 UNITED STATES V. GONZALES, 520 U.S. 1 (1997).
[Syllabus]
187 EXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER
[Syllabus]
187 VIRGINIA OFFICE FOR PROTECTION AND ADVOCACYV. STEWART
[Syllabus]
187 REEVES V. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
[Syllabus]
1. Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, is direct evidence of discriminatory intent required to avoid judgment as a matter of law for the employer? 2. In determining whether to grant judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, should a District Judge weigh all of the evidence or consider only the evidence favoring the non-movant? 3. Whether the standard for granting judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 is the same as the standard for granting judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50?"
187
[Syllabus]
187 SISSON V. RUBY, 497 U.S. 358 (1990)
[Syllabus]
187 NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CORP.V. GARRIS
[Syllabus]
The general maritime cause of action recognized in Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 374, 409__for dealth caused by violation of maritime duties__is available for the negligent breach of a maritime dutry of care.