skip navigation


Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query workers and compensation returned 27 results.

1000 INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, 519 U.S. 248 (1997)
[Syllabus]
867 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DOL V. GREENWICH COLLIERIES, 512 U.S. 267 (1994)
[Syllabus]
854 BATH IRON WORKS V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 506
[Syllabus]
854 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEP'T OF LABOR V. NEWPORT
[Syllabus]
634 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW V. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
[Opinion]
570 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW V. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
[Concurrence]
1000 INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, 519 U.S. 248 (1997)
[Syllabus]
824 HOWARD DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. V. ZURICH AMERICAN INS. CO.
[Syllabus]
802 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DOL V. GREENWICH COLLIERIES, 512 U.S. 267 (1994)
[Syllabus]
789 BATH IRON WORKS V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 506
[Syllabus]
761 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEP'T OF LABOR V. NEWPORT
[Syllabus]
667 AMERICAN MFRS. MUT. INS. CO. V. SULLIVAN
[Syllabus]
570 METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 117 S.CT. 1953, 138 L.ED.2D 327 (1997).
[Syllabus]
501 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. GREATER WASHINGTON BD. OF TRADE, 506 U.S. 125 (1992).
[Syllabus]
467 STEWART V. DUTRA CONSTR. CO.
[Syllabus]
420 METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 515 U.S. 291 (1995).
[Syllabus]
410 ESTATE OF COWART V. NICKLOS DRILLING, 505 U.S. 469 (1992).
[Syllabus]
385 PAULEY V. BETHENERGY MINES, INC., 501 U.S. 680 (1991)
[Syllabus]
341 UNITED STATES V. NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, 513 U.S. 454 (1995).
[Syllabus]
341 EASTERN ENTERPRISES V. APFEL, 524 U.S. 498 (1998)
[Syllabus]
322 HARBOR TUG & BARGE CO. V. PAPAI ET UX., 520 U.S. 548 (1997).
[Syllabus]
322 NORFOLK & WESTERN R. CO. V. AYERS
[Syllabus]
Mental anguish damages resulting from the fear of developing cancer may be recovered under the Federal Employers' Liability Act by a railroad worker suffering from the actionable injury asbestosis caused by work-related exposure to asbestos; the FELA's express terms, reinforced by consistent judicial applications of the Act, allow such a worker to recover his entire damages from a railroad whose negligence jointly caused his injury, thus placing on the railroad the burden of seeking contribution from other potential tortfeasors.
322 LITTON FINANCIAL PRINTING DIVISION V. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190 (1991)
[Syllabus]
322 TEST TWO V. TEST TWO
[Syllabus]
278 MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. WILANDER, 498 U.S. 337 (1991)
[Syllabus]
216 HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INS. CO. V. UNIONPLANTERS BANK, N. A.
[Syllabus]
Does a postpetition administrative creditor in a bankruptcy case have standing under 11 U.S.C. 506© to seek payment of its administrative claim from property of the bankruptcy estate that is encumbered by a secured creditor's lien?"
216 HOWLETT V. BIRKDALE SHIPPING CO., S. A., 512 U.S. 92 (1994).
[Syllabus]
216 INTER MODAL RAIL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY, 520 U.S. 510 (1997)
[Syllabus]
216 TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY CO. OF AMERICA V.PACIFIC GAS & ELEC. CO.
[Syllabus]
216 CATERPILLAR INC. V. LEWIS, 519 U.S. 61 (1996)
[Syllabus]
216 NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CORP.V. GARRIS
[Syllabus]
The general maritime cause of action recognized in Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 374, 409__for dealth caused by violation of maritime duties__is available for the negligent breach of a maritime dutry of care.
216 POLLARD V. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
[Syllabus]
Front pay is not an element of compensatory damages under 42 U. S. C. §1981a and thus is not subject to the damages cap imposed by §1981a(b)(3).
216 RALEIGH V. ILLINOIS DEPT. OF REVENUE
[Syllabus]
Should tax claims in bankruptcy be given the advantage of placing the burden of proof on an objecting trustee, in contrast to the rule applicable to the claims of other creditors?"