Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Your query Export Act returned 6 results.
![]() |
UNITED STATES V. CURTISS-WRIGHT EXPORT CORP. [Opinion] |
![]() |
UNITED STATES V. CURTISS-WRIGHT EXPORT CORP. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
UNITED STATES V. CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING CO. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD. V. EMPAGRAN S.A. [Syllabus] (1) Whether under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 (FTAIA), 15 U.S.C. § 6a, the Sherman Act applies to claims of foreign plaintiffs whose injuries do not arise from the effects of antitrust violations on United States commerce? (2) Whether such foreign plaintiffs lack antitrust standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15(a)? |
![]() |
FRIENDS OF EARTH, INC. V. LAIDLAW ENVI-RONMENTAL SERVICES (TOC), INC. [Syllabus] 1. Whether a citizen suit seeking civil penalties under Section 505 of the Clean Water Act is constitutionally moot under Steel Co. V. Citizens for Better Environment, 118 S. Ct. 1003 (1998), due to lack of redressability, where plaintiffs had standing at the time of the complaint and have shown continuing injury-in-fact but have not obtained injunctive relief. 2. Whether a citizen suit seeking civil penalties under Section 505 of the Clean Water Act is constitutionally moot under Steel Co., due to lack of redressability, when the district court has rendered a declaratory judgment as to liability and the issue of liability was contested. 3. Whether plaintiffs could not be awarded attorneys' fees or litigation costs not be awarded attorneys' fees or litigation costs because the case was dismissed for mootness, even if the litigation was responsible for bringing the defendant into compliance with the Clean Water Act. |
![]() |
MICROSOFT CORP. V. AT&T CORP. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
ITEL CONTAINERS INT'L V. HUDDLESTON, 507 U.S. 60 (1993). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
PASQUANTINO V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus] |