Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Your query Fair Labor Standards Act returned 9 results.
![]() |
HOLLY FARMS CORP. ET AL. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. ET AL., 517 U.S. 392 (1996) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
LONG ISLAND CARE AT HOME, LTD. V. COKE [Syllabus] |
![]() |
LEDBETTER V. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
IBP, INC. V. ALVAREZ [Syllabus] |
![]() |
AUER V. ROBBINS, 519 U.S. 452 (1997). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
MOREAU V. KLEVENHAGEN, 508 U.S. 22 (1993). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
CHRISTENSEN V. HARRIS COUNTY [Syllabus] Whether a public agency governed by the compensatory time provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. 207 (o), may absent a preexisting agreement, require its employees to use accrued compensatory time." |
![]() |
BREUER V. JIM’S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC. [Syllabus] Whether an action commenced in state court under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq., (theFLSA), can be removed by the defendant to a federal district court, even though the FLSA expressly provides that the case can be maintained in state court? Whether the Eleventh Circuit's Interpretation of the word maintained as used in the jurisdictional provisions of the FLSA conflicts with this Court's pronounced definition of the word maintain' to be used when construing federal statutes? When the conflict, disparity and deadlock of opinion between the Eleventh and First Circuits and the Eighth Circuit, and between dozens of district courts around the country, regarding whether FLSA actions commenced in state court are removable to federal court, warrants that this Court, as suggested by the Eleventh Circuit in its opinion below, grant this petition to resolve the question once and for all in order to bring uniformity to the federal courts, and eliminate widespread disparity between litigants in our federal system. |
![]() |
ALDEN V. MAINE [Syllabus] |