skip navigation


Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query Freedom of Information Act returned 12 results.

1000 UNITED STATES DEP'T OF DEFENSE V. F.L.R.A., 510 U.S. 487 (1994).
[Syllabus]
837 MCCONNELL V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N
[Syllabus]
808 UNITED STATES DEP'T OF JUSTICE V. LANDANO, 508 U.S. 165 (1993).
[Syllabus]
780 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMIN. V. FAVISH
[Syllabus]
The Freedom of Information Act's Exemption 7(C)
668 FEDERAL TRADE COMM'N V. TICOR TITLE INS., 504 U.S. 621 (1992).
[Syllabus]
640 RUST V. SULLIVAN, 500 U.S. 173 (1991)
[Syllabus]
617 RENO V. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, 117 S.CT. 2329, 138 L.ED.2D 874 (1997)
[Syllabus]
516 ASHCROFT V. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
[Syllabus]
Whether the Child Online Protection Act violates the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
460 LEHNERY V. FERRIS FACULTY ASSN., 500 U.S. 507 (1991)
[Syllabus]
387 DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR V. KLAMATHWATER USERS PROTECTIVE ASSN.
[Syllabus]
Documents passing between Indian Tribes and the Interior Department addressing tribal interests subject to state and federal water-allocation proceedings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act as "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters" under FOIA Exemption 5.
387 UNITED STATES V. UNITED FOODS, INC.
[Syllabus]
The Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act's requirement that fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertising promoting mushroom sales violates the First Amendment.
387 GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER
[Syllabus]
1. Does the University of Michigan Law School's use of racial preferences in student admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C> 2000d), or 42 U.S.C. 1981? 2. Should an appellate court required to apply strict scrutiny to governmental race-based preferences review de novo the district court's findings because the fact issues are constitutional?