Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Your query census returned 15 results.
![]() |
UTAH V. EVANS [Syllabus] The Census Bureau's use of "hot-deck imputation" to fill in gaps in census information and resolve conflicts in the data does not violate 13 U. S. C. §195, which forbids use of "the statistical method known as 'sampling' " in determining population for purposes of apportioning congressional Representatives, and is not inconsistent with the Constitution's Census Clause, which requires an "actual Enumeration" of each State's population. |
![]() |
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE V. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 525 U.S. 316 (1999) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
WISCONSIN V. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL., 517 U.S. 1 (1996). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
FRANKLIN V. MASSASSACHUSETTS., 505 U.S. 788 (1992). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
UNITED STATES DEP'T OF COMMERCE V. MONTANA, 503 U.S. 442 (1992). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS V.PERRY [Syllabus] |
![]() |
GEORGIA V. ASHCROFT [Syllabus] 1. Whether Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Requires the Drawing of Safe Majority-Minority Districts with Super majority Minority Populations, Rather than Districts that Afford Minorities Equal Opportunities at Success? 2. Whether Section 5 can be Constitutionally Construed to require the Drawing of Supermajority Minority Legislative Districts in Order to Create Safe Seats, Rather than Seats that Afford Minorities Equal Opportunities at Success? 3. Whether Private Parties Should be Allowed to Intervene in a Section 5 Preclearance Action and Assume the Role and Authority of the Attorney General. |
![]() |
RENO V. BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BD. [Syllabus] Whether the district court erred in concluding that, because Bossier Parish School Board’s 1992 redistricting plan was not enacted with a retrogressive purpose, it was not enacted with ""the purpose *** of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race,"" within the meaning of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S C. 1973c. |
![]() |
ABRAMS V. JOHNSON, 117 S.CT. 1925, 138 L.ED.2D 285 (1997). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
BUSH V. VERA, 517 U.S. 952 (1996). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
LAWYER V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 117 S.CT. 2186, 138 L.ED.2D 669 (1997). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
RENO V. BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, 520 U.S. 471 (1997). [Syllabus] |
![]() |
CITY OF SHERRILL V. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF N. Y. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
BRANCH V. SMITH [Syllabus] The Federal District Court properly enjoined a Mississippi state court's proposed congressional redistricting plan and fashioned its own plan under 2 U. S. C. §2c. |
![]() |
GROWE V. EMISON, 507 U.S. 25 (1993). [Syllabus] |