IRWIN v. SAN FRANCISCO SAVINGS UNION.

136 U.S. 578 (10 S.Ct. 1064, 34 L.Ed. 540)

IRWIN v. SAN FRANCISCO SAVINGS UNION.

Decided: February 3, 1890

Statement of Case from pages 578-580 intentionally omitted

Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for plaintiff in error.

George A. Nourse, for defendant in error.

TOP


PER CURIAM.

It is conceded by counsel for plaintiff in error that this case is governed by Wright v. Roseberry, 121 U. S. 488, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 985, and the judgment is therefore, upon the authority of that case, affirmed.

CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org