Search

Search results

1. RICHARD D. WOOD, JOHN YARROW, JAMES ABBOTT, AND JOSEPH BACON, COPARTNERS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF WOOD, ABBOTT, AND COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. ALEXANDER C. DAVIS.

   BACON, COPARTNERS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF WOOD, ABBOTT, AND COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. ALEXANDER C. ... DAVIS. Decided: NotFound opinion, NELSON [HTML] THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United ... States for the northern district of Illinois. Davis, a citizen resident of Illinois, filed a bill in the ...

2. POWELL et al. v. UNITED STATES CARTRIDGE CO. AARON et al. v. FORD, BACON & DAVIS, Inc. CREEL et al. v. LONE STAR DEFENSE CORPORATION.

   respondent Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc. TOP Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court. The ... al. v. FORD, BACON & DAVIS, Inc. CREEL et al. v. LONE STAR DEFENSE CORPORATION. Nos. 96, 79, 58. ... question in each of these cases is whether the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 1 applies to ...

3. HOPKINS, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. BACON.

   282 U.S. 122 (51 S.Ct. 62, 75 L.Ed. 249) HOPKINS, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. BACON. No. 84. ... holding that if the husband, as agent of the community, acts in fraud of the wife's rights, she is ... of Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Messrs. Palmer Hutcheson, of Houston, Tex., Harry C. Weeks, of ...

4. J. BACON & SONS v. MARTIN, Commissioner of Revenue of Commonwealth of Kentucky.

   305 U.S. 380 (59 S.Ct. 257, 83 L.Ed. 233) J. BACON & SONS v. MARTIN, Commissioner of Revenue ... business in Kentucky. Plaintiff contended that the tax was on 'the act of receiving' and hence ... therefore, follows that the imposition of the tax against the retailer is not on the act of receiving the ...

5. BACON et al. v. STATE OF TEXAS.

   permitted under the acts of 1879 and 1881; (4) Bacon and Graves have never paid, or offered to pay, for said ... 163 U.S. 207 (16 S.Ct. 1023, 41 L.Ed. 132) BACON et al. v. STATE OF TEXAS. No. 296. Decided: May ... Bacon, Graves, and Gibbs, in the district court of the county of Mitchell, in the state of Texas, for the ...

6. JOHN BACON, ALEXANDER SYMINGTON, AND THOMAS ROBINS, COMPLAINANTS AND APPELLANTS, v. VOLNEY E. HOWARD.

   avers 'that, at the time of passage of the act of Congress of the Republic of Texas, approved June ... with any reasonable diligence, have learned the passage of said act, and caused suit to be instituted ... showing, are barred by the first section of an act entitled 'An act of limitations,' approved ...

7. ISAAC SHELBY, COMPLAINANT, v. JOHN BACON, ALEXANDER SYMINGTON, THOMAS ROBINS, JAMES ROBERTSON, RICHARD H. BAYARD, JAMES S. NEWBOLD, HERMAN COPE, THOMAS S. TAYLOR, AND GEORGE BEACH.

   legislature of the state of Pennsylvania, by an act passed on the 18th day of February, 1836. It appeared that ... assignment of a portion of its property to the defendants Bacon, Symington, and Robins, in trust to secure ... aforesaid an account, duly verified, of their receipts and disbursements, and of their acts and doings, as ...

8. OTIS v. BACON.

   Supreme Judicial Court of the state of Massachusetts, in a case involving the construction of an act of ... congress, and the justification of an officer of the United States, claiming justification under such act ... : the decision of the Court below being against the justification thus set up. The case was this: Bacon ...

9. BACON ET AL. v. HART.

   66 U.S. 38 (, 17 L.Ed. 52) BACON ET AL. v. HART. Decided: NotFound Mr. Stanton, of Washington ... served on the party as his counsel, the cause is not brought into this court, agreeably to the act of ... city, for the defendant in error, moved that the writ of error in this case be dismissed for want of ...

10. BACON and others v. RIVES and others.

    Of that sum Bacon & Baskerville owned $48,000, Stewart $48,000, Maury $10,000, Macfarland $5,000, ... and W. C. Rives $20,000. Subsequently, however, Bacon & Baskerville became the owner of $80,000, ... given by Bacon & Baskerville, the managers and business negotiators of the enterprise, with the ...

Pages