Search the opinions of the US Circuit Courts of Appeal

Did you mean AND AND scorcher?

Your query 295 AND 495 AND schechter returned 18 results.

	OPINION/ORDER Save Our Valley argues that the project will have the effect of discriminating against Rainier Valley residents based on race in violation of a Department of Transportation regulation. The primary question before us is whether that Department of Transportation regulation creates an individual federal right that can be enforced under the Civil Rights Act. I The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (
	OPINION/ORDER It is an authority constrained by no less a power than that of the People themselves. The constitution is written.
	OPINION/ORDER With him on the briefs were Henry V. With him on the briefs were Daniel R. Were on the briefs for the State Petitioners in 97 1440 and 97 1441. Kaplan on the brief were Lois J. Were on the brief for intervenor Massachusetts and New Jersey. C. Boyden Gray and Alan Charles Raul were on the brief for Amicus Curiae Congressman Tom Bliley in 97 1441. With them on the briefs were David H. With him on the briefs was David S. With him on the briefs were Harold P. Edgar on the brief were Lois J. Were on the brief for intervenors Massachusetts and New Jersey. C. Boyden Gray and Alan Charles Raul were on the brief for amicus curiae Senator Orrin Hatch in 97 1440. Numerous petitions for review have been filed for each rule. That EPA should have considered the environmental damage likely to result from the NAAQS' financial impact on the Abandoned Mine Recla mation Fund. We agree with petitioners that EPA's choice of PM10 as the indicator for coarse particulate matter was arbitrary and capricious. Although the factors EPA uses in determining the degree of public health concern associated with different levels of ozone and PM are reason able.
	OPINION/ORDER He argues that the regulations under which he was convicted are facially unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers principle. Because the regulations were promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior (
	OPINION/ORDER Allstate Insurance Company.1 Turner was a field claims adjuster for Allstate. Turner was authorized to write settlement checks on be 1 Allstate Insurance Company is an Illinois corporation and is a subsidiary of Allstate Corporation. The other thirteen uncharged checks were considered during sentencing. In this appeal Michael Turner argues that 18 U.S.C. § 1033 is unconstitutional as Congress has exceeded its authority to legislate under the Commerce Clause. Turner avers that neither he nor Allstate Insurance Company are instrumentalities or things in interstate commerce and that his actions were wholly intrastate. His activity is only tangentially related to and did not have a substantial affect on interstate commerce. Affect a company which is involved in interstate commerce. Cl. 3. 2 Turner admitted that he was not authorized to deposit the checks into his account and that by doing so he committed a crime. Turner could have been charged under any number of Illinois statutes relating to theft or deception.
	OPINION/ORDER The Lower Brule Sioux Tribe sought to have 91 acres of offreservation land that it had purchased taken into trust. The land is located within the municipal limits of the city of Oacoma. Seeking review of the Secretary's action and contending that 25 U.S.C. § 465 was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The district court concluded that the statute was constitutional. Held that it was without jurisdiction to review the remaining claims and dismissed the case. We concluded that the Department had interpreted its own power too broadly and was exercising that power in an unchecked manner because it had also interpreted the statute as delegating unreviewable discretionary authority to the Secretary. The Secretary of the Interior at the time the land was taken into trust was Bruce Babbitt. The current Secretary is Gale A. A significant loss in state revenue and numerous jurisdictional problems would result if the land were taken into trust. The State again filed suit in federal court to challenge the agency action.4 The suit was delayed for the completion of an environmental assessment in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
	OPINION/ORDER S 669 is thus unconstitutional as applied to the facts of her case. We note that we are the first court to address the constitutionality of this statute as an exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. Will affirm. I. The relevant facts are not in dispute and may be briefly recounted. Whited was responsible for receiving payment from Center patients. It was common practice for patients to pay by endorsing a check from their insurance provider. Whited was charged by indictment of one count of theft or embezzlement in connection with health care. The term
	OPINION/ORDER Filed suit seeking to have declared unconstitutional several provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (
	OPINION/ORDER We have determined that GAIC. Rigel Ships Agencies (
	OPINION/ORDER The Lake is part of a hydropower project on the Osage River that is owned and operated by Intervenor Union Electric Company under a license from FERC that authorizes Union Electric to allow certain uses of the Lake for the benefit of the public and to recoup its costs of doing so. That the fees were unreasonable. The Water Power Act was the outgrowth of a widely supported effort of the conservationists to secure enactment of a complete scheme of national regulation which would promote the comprehensive development of the water resources of the Nation. In so far as it was within the reach of the federal power to do so. Take into account not only the
	OPINION/ORDER The myriad provisions in the federal criminal code are justified. We are required in this case to determine whether Congress has authority under its power
	01-4229 -- U.S. V. BROWN -- 07/08/2003 Circuit Judge.
	OPINION/ORDER Is amended as follows: 5893 5894 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v.
	OPINION/ORDER
	OPINION/ORDER The District Court then conducted a six day 1 Although the members of the Board have been sued individually in their official capacities. Yet this apparent simplicity is deceptive. 1344 (6th Cir. 1994) (
	OPINION/ORDER Circuit Judge: The sole issue on this appeal is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (
	OPINION/ORDER The constitutionality of a statute criminalizing an activity that is not directly linked to interstate commerce. The precise question before us is whether it was within Congress's power under the Commerce Clause to enact 18 U.S.C. Which imposes criminal liability on individuals who possess child pornography that has not itself traveled in interstate commerce as long as one of the materials from which the pornography was created in this case. This statute has a jurisdictional element or
	01-4229 -- U.S. V. BROWN -- 11/04/2003 Circuit Judges.