Search the opinions of the US Circuit Courts of Appeal

use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

This collection has many hidden limitations. To find out what you're really searching, see the disclaimer .

Your query 473 AND 402 AND Aguilar returned 10 results.

	OPINION/ORDER
	OPINION/ORDER BACKGROUND Some of the background of this litigation is set forth in Peter v. Relevant to this fee dispute is the following. To whom this matter was referred for submission by consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Because another matter is pending in the district court. The State indicated it would work with the state board of education to repeal the rule to the extent it was inconsistent with Agostini. The State will no longer enforce the rule as limited to neutral sites
	OPINION/ORDER Which are usually intended to convey an individual's interpretation of the holiday season. This right is reinforced by the Establishment Clause. Which prevents the government from imposing its religious will upon its citizens. Citizens will find themselves embroiled in legal and political disputes over the content of municipal displays. Threats of municipal display lawsuits and restraining orders have become almost as much a part of the holiday season as last minute shopping sprees. We will affirm the district court's holding that the City's original display of the crèche and the menorah violated the Establishment Clause. We will hold that the district court applied the wrong standard to determine that the City's second display. As well as the property on which the displays are located. Are owned by the City. The crèche is a depiction of the day Jesus was born in a manger in Bethlehem. The City's display is approximately twelve feet long by eight feet wide and includes replicas of Joseph. A menorah is used by Jews to commemorate the Miracle of the Oils.
	95-4084 -- BAUCHMAN V. WEST HIGH SCHOOL (SALT LAKE CITY) -- 12/18/1997 The Religion and Speech clauses of the Utah Constitution. The constitutional issues raised in this appeal are issues of acute public interest issues which evoke diverse opinions and strong emotions. Bauchman's claims focus on religious neutrality in public schools only intensifies that interest and emotion.
	OPINION/ORDER We are asked to decide whether a policy adopted by the Black Horse Pike Regional Board of Education that allows a vote of the senior class to determine if prayer will be included in high school graduation ceremonies is constitutional. For the reasons that follow we hold that this policy is inconsistent with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. We will affirm. These prayers have historically been delivered by local clergy on a rotating basis in an attempt to afford different denominations the opportunity to be represented. Two policies were presented to the Board at its May 23. The other proposal would not have allowed
	OPINION/ORDER Denied the college's request for money because the Commission believed that Columbia Union was a
	OPINION/ORDER Glasson & Dineen was on brief for appellant Guadalupe Rojas. Were on brief for appellee Cynthia A. Cobleigh were on brief for appellee Salvation Army. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND The following facts are not disputed. Rojas was a paid employee of the Salvation Army. Rojas was not. Was not required to be. The DET found that Rojas was ineligible because her former employer. Was exempt from contributing to Rhode Island's unemployment insurance scheme under sections 28 42 8(4) and 28 44 11 of the Rhode Island General Laws.1 Pursuant to the exemption for religious employers under section 28 42 8(4). No taxes were withheld from Rojas's wages by the Salvation Army. Her income was not reported to the DET. The DET's denial of benefits was upheld by a DET referee after a hearing. Later the referee's determination was upheld by the DET Board of Review. The DET determined that the Salvation Army is a
	OPINION/ORDER Died before it was released. 2 1 Attorney for Appellant Evan C. The ministerial exception was created to protect church autonomy and avoid entangling government in religious affairs. Where otherwise illegal discrimination is based on religious belief. Or the internal regulations of a church is simply the exercise of intolerance. Demoted her because she is a woman and because 5 she opposed sexual harassment by Gannon officials. A motion such as Gannon's is more properly dealt with under Rule 12(b)(6). We will therefore reverse the dismissal of her Title VII claims. What we deal with here is functionally a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal. 6 2 religion clauses removed jurisdiction. We cannot conclude at this stage of litigation that these claims will require an examination of matters of faith. They are not barred by the religion clauses.3 I. The facts set forth below are drawn from Petruska's First Amended Complaint. Gannon University is a Catholic diocesan college located in Erie. Petruska was appointed permanent chaplain on July 1.
	OPINION/ORDER It is ORDERED. That the opinion in this case is no longer protected from public disclosure by Rule 6(e). It is further ORDERED. It is further ORDERED. That the order to show cause is discharged. It is further ORDERED. Documents relating to an alleged relationship between President Clinton and Lewinsky and any gifts the President may have given her. States in relevant part: I have never had a sexual relationship with the Presi dent. [and] he did not propose that we have a sexual relationship.... Were official receptions. Where I was working at the time. There were other people present on those occasions. Other items sought were protected from disclosure by the attorney client privilege. Well settled law dictates that
	OPINION/ORDER Circuit Judge: I The issue before us is whether a driver who transports a group of illegal aliens from a drop off point in the United States to another destination in this country commits only the offense of transporting aliens