Search the opinions of the US Circuit Courts of Appeal

him on the briefs were Kevin C. Was on the brief for

amicus curiae District of Columbia Financial Responsibility

&. On the brief

were Brendan V.

the District of Columbia contends that the officers are enti

tled to qualified immunity because. It was not

clearly established prior to Eric Butera's death that the

officers' conduct would violate these rights.

the appeal presents two questions of first impression in this

circuit: (1) whether the District of Columbia can be held

constitutionally liable for failing to protect an individual who

is not in custody from harm inflicted by a third party.

through which Eric Butera might have succeeded in proving a

constitutional violation. Was not clearly established prior to

his death. The officers were entitled to qualified immu

nity. We also hold that there is no parental due process right

to the company of an adult child who is independent.

Plaintiffs Appellants L.B. and J.B. are the parents of K.B. A child who was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder in 1997. Which is required by the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (

defendants were convicted by a jury in the United States

District Court for the District of New Jersey of kidnapping

and conspiracy to kidnap.

and Quinones were also convicted of conspiracy to

distribute and possess cocaine. Moreno was convicted of using and

carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. We will discuss each of these

challenges in turn. Focusing in more detail on Moreno's

claim that venue in New Jersey was improper to try the

Plaintiffs Lisa Ransom and her daughter Amber Ransom filed this action under 42 U.S.C.

The case raises two issues. First is the classic question whether each of the plaintiffs meets the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § . Using an analytic approach that we have since rejected. Held that it was a legal certainty that none of the plaintiffs' claims was worth $75. We reverse and hold that it is not a legal certainty that she could not recover an award over $75. We uphold the district court's conclusion that none of Beatriz's family members satisfies the amount in controversy requirement.

The second question is whether Beatriz's family members may nonetheless remain as plaintiffs under the supplemental jurisdiction statute.

Patane was indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.

At the sentencing. On the ground that the record was insufficient to conduct an adequate proportionality review of the sentence. Duren's petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court on October 13. The Rule 20 court concluded that the majority of defendant's claims were procedurally barred and denied the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the merits. Duren v. Duren contends (A) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because he presented an invalid defense. Duren asserts that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel: (B) because he failed to present mitigating evidence of alcohol and drug abuse.

At the sentencing. On the ground that the record was insufficient to conduct an adequate proportionality review of the sentence. Duren's petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court on October 13. The Rule 20 court concluded that the majority of defendant's claims were procedurally barred and denied the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the merits. Duren v. Duren contends (A) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because he presented an invalid defense. Duren asserts that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel: (B) because he failed to present mitigating evidence of alcohol and drug abuse.

At issue today is whether the Duval County. The total absence of state involvement in deciding whether there will be a graduation message. Who will speak. Is not state sponsored. Nor how autonomous the speaker may be in crafting her message.

The facts of this case are straightforward. Other religious prayers or messages were traditionally offered. Student led prayer during the graduation ceremony so long as the administration and faculty were not involved in the decision making process. The memorandum was entitled

At issue today is whether the Duval County. The total absence of state involvement in deciding whether there will be a graduation message. Who will speak. Is not state sponsored. Nor how autonomous the speaker may be in crafting her message.

The facts of this case are straightforward. Other religious prayers or messages were traditionally offered. Student led prayer during the graduation ceremony so long as the administration and faculty were not involved in the decision making process. The memorandum was entitled

Jose Antonio Rodriguez Matos (

30 37 3.2 Dissemination of material that is harmful to a minor by computer

A. Dissemination of material that is harmful to a minor by computer consists of the use of a computer communications system that allows the input. Whoever commits dissemination of material that is harmful to a minor by computer is guilty of a misdemeanor.

The statute provides the following defenses:

In a prosecution for dissemination of material that is harmful to a minor by computer. It is a defense that the defendant has:

1. in good faith taken reasonable. Including any method that is feasible with available technology.

Jose Antonio Rodriguez Matos (

Trent claimed to have ties with the local police through his work as a confidential informant. Four such persons were at Trent's apartment. On the night of the murder: three testified at Freund's trial and the fourth was the victim.