10 USC § 2382 - Consolidation of contract requirements: policy and restrictions
Section, added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, § 801(a)(1),Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1538; amended Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(2),Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2398; Pub. L. 111–240, title I, § 1313(b),Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2539; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1076(d)(3),Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1951, related to policy and restrictions regarding consolidation of contract requirements.
A prior section
2382, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 136; Dec. 1, 1981, Pub. L. 97–86, title IX, § 911(a)(1),
95 Stat. 1120; Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, § 1484(b)(3), (f)(2), (g)(2), (h)(3),104 Stat. 1716, 1717; Oct. 29, 1992, Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(b)(1),
106 Stat. 4516, authorized the President, upon declaration of war by Congress or declaration of national emergency by the President or by Congress, to prescribe regulations to control excessive profits on defense contracts during period of such war or national emergency, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–355, title II, § 2102(a),Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3309.
(a)
Policy.—
The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretary of each military department, the head of each Defense Agency, and the head of each Department of Defense Field Activity to ensure that the decisions made by that official regarding consolidation of contract requirements of the department, agency, or field activity, as the case may be, are made with a view to providing small business concerns with appropriate opportunities to participate in Department of Defense procurements as prime contractors and appropriate opportunities to participate in such procurements as subcontractors.
(b)
Limitation on Use of Acquisition Strategies Involving Consolidation.—
(1)
Subject to section
44(c)(4),
[1]
an official of a military department, Defense Agency, or Department of Defense Field Activity may not execute an acquisition strategy that includes a consolidation of contract requirements of the military department, agency, or activity with a total value in excess of $5,000,000, unless the senior procurement executive concerned first—
(2)
A senior procurement executive may determine that an acquisition strategy involving a consolidation of contract requirements is necessary and justified for the purposes of paragraph (1) if the benefits of the acquisition strategy substantially exceed the benefits of each of the possible alternative contracting approaches identified under subparagraph (B) of that paragraph. However, savings in administrative or personnel costs alone do not constitute, for such purposes, a sufficient justification for a consolidation of contract requirements in a procurement unless the total amount of the cost savings is expected to be substantial in relation to the total cost of the procurement.
(c)
Definitions.—
In this section:
(1)
The terms “consolidation of contract requirements” and “consolidation”, with respect to contract requirements of a military department, Defense Agency, or Department of Defense Field Activity, mean a use of a solicitation to obtain offers for a single contract or a multiple award contract to satisfy two or more requirements of that department, agency, or activity for goods or services that have previously been provided to, or performed for, that department, agency, or activity under two or more separate contracts smaller in cost than the total cost of the contract for which the offers are solicited.
(2)
The term “multiple award contract” means—
(A)
a contract that is entered into by the Administrator of General Services under the multiple award schedule program referred to in section
2302
(2)(C) of this title;
[1] See References in Text note below.
Source
(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, § 801(a)(1),Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1538; amended Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(2),Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2398; Pub. L. 111–240, title I, § 1313(b),Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2539.)
References in Text
Section
44(c)(4), referred to in subsec. (b)(1), probably means section
2[44(c)(4)] of Pub. L. 85–536, as added by Pub. L. 111–240, title I, § 1313(a)(2),Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2538, which is classified to section
657q
(c)(4) of Title
15, Commerce and Trade.
Sections 303H through 303K of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (c)(2)(B), means sections 303H to 303K of act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, which were classified to sections
253h to
253k, respectively, of former Title 41, Public Contracts, and were repealed and restated as sections
4103,
4105,
4106, and
4101, respectively, of Title
41, Public Contracts, by Pub. L. 111–350, §§ 3,
7(b),Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3677, 3855. For disposition of sections of former Title 41, see Disposition Table preceding section
101 of Title
41.
Section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(3)(A), means section 16(c) ofPub. L. 93–400, which was classified to section 414(c) of former Title 41, Public Contracts, and was repealed and restated as section
1702
(c) of Title
41, Public Contracts, by Pub. L. 111–350, §§ 3,
7(b),Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3677, 3855. For disposition of sections of former Title 41, see Disposition Table preceding section
101 of Title
41.
Prior Provisions
A prior section
2382, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 136; Dec. 1, 1981, Pub. L. 97–86, title IX, § 911(a)(1),
95 Stat. 1120; Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, § 1484(b)(3), (f)(2), (g)(2), (h)(3),104 Stat. 1716, 1717; Oct. 29, 1992, Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(b)(1),
106 Stat. 4516, authorized the President, upon declaration of war by Congress or declaration of national emergency by the President or by Congress, to prescribe regulations to control excessive profits on defense contracts during period of such war or national emergency, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–355, title II, § 2102(a),Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3309.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 111–240substituted “Subject to section
44(c)(4), an official” for “An official” in introductory provisions.
2006—Subsec. (c)(3)(A). Pub. L. 109–364substituted “section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))” for “section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))”.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, § 801(c),Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1540, provided that: “This section [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note below] applies with respect to procurements for which solicitations are issued after the date occurring 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 24, 2003].”
Data Review
Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, § 801(b),Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1540, provided that:
“(1) The Secretary of Defense shall revise the data collection systems of the Department of Defense to ensure that such systems are capable of identifying each procurement that involves a consolidation of contract requirements within the department with a total value in excess of $5,000,000.
“(2) The Secretary shall ensure that appropriate officials of the Department of Defense periodically review the information collected pursuant to paragraph (1) in cooperation with the Small Business Administration—
“(A) to determine the extent of the consolidation of contract requirements in the Department of Defense; and
“(B) to assess the impact of the consolidation of contract requirements on the availability of opportunities for small business concerns to participate in Department of Defense procurements, both as prime contractors and as subcontractors.
“(3) In this subsection:
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Wednesday, May 29, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 10 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| § 2382 | repealed | 2012 | 112-239 [Sec.] 1671(c)(1) | 126 Stat. 2084 |
| § 2382 | 2012 | 112-239 [Sec.] 1076(d)(3) | 126 Stat. 1951 |
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.