10 USC § 2547 - Acquisition-related functions of chiefs of the armed forces
(a)
Performance of Certain Acquisition-related Functions.—
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps assist the Secretary of the military department concerned in the performance of the following acquisition-related functions of such department:
(1)
The development of requirements for equipping the armed force concerned (subject, where appropriate, to validation by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council pursuant to section
181 of this title).
(3)
The recommendation of trade-offs among life-cycle cost, schedule, and performance objectives, and procurement quantity objectives, to ensure acquisition programs deliver best value in meeting the approved military requirements.
(4)
Termination of development or procurement programs for which life-cycle cost, schedule, and performance expectations are no longer consistent with approved military requirements and levels of priority, or which no longer have approved military requirements.
(5)
The development of career paths in acquisition for military personnel (as required by section
1722a of this title).
(b)
Rule of Construction.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the assignment of functions under section
3014
(c)(1)(A), section
5014(c)(1)(A), or section
8014
(c)(1)(A) of this title, except as explicitly provided in this section.
(c)
Definitions.—
In this section:
(1)
The term “requirements creep” means the addition of new technical or operational specifications after a requirements document is approved by the appropriate validation authority for the requirements document.
(2)
The term “requirements document” means a document produced in the requirements process that is provided for an acquisition program to guide the subsequent development, production, and testing of the program and that—
(A)
justifies the need for a materiel approach, or an approach that is a combination of materiel and non-materiel, to satisfy one or more specific capability gaps;
(a)
Performance of Certain Acquisition-related Functions.—
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps assist the Secretary of the military department concerned in the performance of the following acquisition-related functions of such department:
(1)
The development of requirements relating to the defense acquisition system (subject, where appropriate, to validation by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council pursuant to section
181 of this title).
(3)
The development of career paths in acquisition for military personnel (as required by section
1722a of this title).
(b)
Rule of Construction.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the assignment of functions under section
3014
(c)(1)(A), section
5014(c)(1)(A), or section
8014
(c)(1)(A) of this title, except as explicitly provided in this section.
(c)
Definitions.—
In this section:
(1)
The term “requirements creep” means the addition of new technical or operational specifications after a requirements document is approved by the appropriate validation authority for the requirements document.
(2)
The term “requirements document” means a document produced in the requirements process that is provided for an acquisition program to guide the subsequent development, production, and testing of the program and that—
(A)
justifies the need for a materiel approach, or an approach that is a combination of materiel and non-materiel, to satisfy one or more specific capability gaps;
Source
(Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 861(a),Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4289.)
Prior Provisions
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Wednesday, May 29, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 10 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| § 2547 | 2012 | 112-239 [Sec.] 951(c) | 126 Stat. 1891 |
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.