(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. B, title XXVIII, § 2809(a)(1),Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1541; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1704(b)(1),Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, § 1031(a)(43),Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1602; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(48),Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3846; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1061(25),Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1584.)
Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 98–115
, title VIII, § 802,Oct. 11, 1983, 97 Stat. 783
, as amended, which was set out as a note under section
of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–190
, § 2809(b).
2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–81
, § 1061(25)(A), struck out par. (1) designation before “The Secretary of a military department” and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: “The budget material submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, in connection with the budget submitted pursuant to section
for each fiscal year shall include materials that identify the military housing rental guaranty projects for which agreements are proposed to be entered into under subsection (a) in that fiscal year.”
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 112–81
, § 1061(25)(B), (C), redesignatedsubsec. (g) as (f) and struck out former subsec. (f). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (f) read as follows: “An agreement may not be entered into under subsection (a) until—
“(1) the Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, submits to the appropriate committees of Congress, in writing, an economic analysis (based upon accepted life cycle costing procedures) which demonstrates that the proposed agreement is cost effective when compared with alternative means of furnishing the same housing facilities; and
“(2) a period of 21 days has expired following the date on which the economic analysis is received by those committees or, if over sooner, a period of 14 days has expired following the date on which a copy of the economic analysis is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section
of this title.”
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 112–81
, § 1061(25)(C), redesignatedsubsec. (g) as (f).
Pub. L. 111–350
substituted “chapter 71 of title
” for “the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41
U.S.C. 601 et seq.)”.
2003—Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 108–136
substituted “21 days” for “21 calendar days” and inserted before period at end “or, if over sooner, a period of 14 days has expired following the date on which a copy of the economic analysis is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section
of this title”.
2002—Subsecs. (a), (b), (c)(4)(B), (11), (e), (f)(1). Pub. L. 107–296
substituted “of Homeland Security” for “of Transportation” wherever appearing.
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296
effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) ofPub. L. 107–296
, set out as a note under section
of this title.
Section 2809(c) ofPub. L. 102–190
provided that: “Section
, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to contracts entered into under that section on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 5, 1991]. The amendment made by subsection (b) [repealing provisions set out as a note under section
of this title] shall not affect the validity of any contract entered into before that date under section 802 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (10
U.S.C. 2821 note
), as in effect on the day before that date.”