Amendments
2018—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted “the requirement” for “the the requirement”.
2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(a), substituted “assignment shall be not less than two years.” for “assignment—
“(1) for general and flag officers shall be not less than two years; and
“(2) for other officers shall be not less than three years.”
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(b), (g)(1), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c) and struck out former subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (c) read as follows: “The Secretary may for purposes of section 661(c)(1)(B) of this title authorize a joint duty assignment of less than the period prescribed by subsection (a), but not less than two years, without the requirement for a waiver under subsection (b) in the case of an officer—
“(1) who has a military occupational specialty designated under section 668(d) of this title as a critical occupational specialty; and
“(2) for whom such joint duty assignment is the initial joint duty assignment.”
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(2), substituted “subsection (d)(2)” for “subsection (f)(3)”.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), redesignated subsec. (f) as (d). Former subsec. (d) redesignated (c).
Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(1), substituted “the requirement in subsection (a)” for “the standards prescribed in subsection (a)” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (d)(1)(D). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(2), substituted “assignment as prescribed by the Secretary of Defense in regulations.” for “assignment—
“(i) for unusual personal reasons, including extreme hardship and medical conditions, beyond the control of the officer or the armed forces; or
“(ii) to another joint duty assignment immediately after—
“(I) the officer was promoted to a higher grade, if the reassignment was made because no joint duty assignment was available within the same organization that was commensurate with the officer’s new grade; or
“(II) the officer’s position was eliminated in a reorganization.”
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(3), substituted “subsection (e)” for “subsection (g)”.
Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(3)–(5), redesignated par. (3) as (2), substituted “the requirement in subsection (a)” for “the applicable standard prescribed in subsection (a)”, and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “Service in a joint duty assignment outside the United States or in Alaska or Hawaii which is less than the applicable standard prescribed in subsection (a).”
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(4), redesignated par. (3) as (2).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(d), (g)(1), (4), redesignated subsec. (g) as (e), substituted “subsection (d)(2)” for “subsection (f)(3)”, and struck out former subsec. (e). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (e) read as follows:
“(1) The Secretary shall ensure that the average length of joint duty assignments during any fiscal year, measured by the lengths of the joint duty assignments ending during that fiscal year, meets the standards prescribed in subsection (a).
“(2) In computing the average length of joint duty assignments for purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary may exclude the following service:
“(A) Service described in subsection (c).
“(B) Service described in subsection (d).
“(C) Service described in subsection (f)(6).”
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), (5), redesignated subsec. (h) as (f) and substituted “subsection (d)(1)” for “paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (f)”. Former subsec. (f) redesignated (d).
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(e)(1), substituted “the requirement in subsection (a)” for “standards prescribed in subsection (a)”.
Subsec. (f)(2) to (6). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(e)(2)–(4), redesignated pars. (3), (5), and (6) as (2), (3), and (4), respectively, struck out “, but not less than two years” before period at end of par. (4), and struck out former pars. (2) and (4) which read as follows:
“(2) A joint duty assignment under the circumstances described in subsection (c).”
“(4) A joint duty assignment outside the United States or in Alaska or Hawaii for which the normal accompanied-by-dependents tour of duty is prescribed by regulation to be at least two years in length, if the officer serves in the assignment for a period equivalent to the accompanied-by-dependents tour length.”
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), redesignated subsec. (g) as (e).
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), redesignated subsec. (h) as (f).
Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(f), struck out par. (1) designation before “The Secretary of Defense may”, substituted “award” for “accord”, and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: “For the purpose of computing under subsection (e) the average length of joint duty assignments during a fiscal year, the amount of any constructive service credited under this subsection with respect to a joint duty assignment to be counted in that computation shall be excluded.”
2008—Subsec. (d)(1)(D). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(a)(1), added subpar. (D) and struck out former subpar. (D) which read as follows: “a qualifying reassignment (as described in subsection (g)(4)).”
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(a)(2), added par. (3) and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: “Service in a joint duty assignment in a case in which—
“(A) the officer’s tour of duty in that assignment brings the officer’s cumulative service for purposes of subsection (f)(3) to the applicable standard prescribed in subsection (a); and
“(B) the length of time served in that assignment (in any case other than an assignment which is described in subsection (g)(4)(B)) was not less than two years.”
Subsec. (e)(2). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(b), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “In computing the average length of joint duty assignments for purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary may exclude the following service:
“(A) Service described in subsection (c), except that not more than 12½ percent of all joint duty assignments shown on the list published pursuant to section 668(b)(2)(A) of this title may be so excluded in any year.
“(B) Service described in subsection (d).
“(C) Service described in subsection (f)(6), except that no more than 10 percent of all joint duty assignments shown on the list published pursuant to section 668(b)(2)(A) of this title may be so excluded in any year.”
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(c), in par. (3) substituted “Accrued joint experience” for “Cumulative service”, in par. (4) struck out “(except that not more than 6 percent of all joint duty assignments may be considered to be under this paragraph at any time)” before period at end, added par. (6), and struck out former par. (6) which read as follows “A second joint duty assignment that is less than the period required under subsection (a), but not less than two years, without regard to whether a waiver was granted for such assignment under subsection (b).”.
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(d), amended subsec. (g) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (g) related to cumulative service of an officer in joint duty assignments.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(e), substituted “paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (f)” for “subsection (f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(4), or (g)(2)” in par. (1) and struck out par. (3) which read as follows: “This subsection shall not apply in the case of an officer who serves less than 10 months in the joint duty assignment.”
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(f), struck out subsec. (i) which related to joint duty credit for certain joint task force assignments.
2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–364, in introductory provisions, substituted “661(c)(1)(B)” for “661(c)(2)”, redesignated pars. (2) and (3) as (1) and (2), respectively, in par. (1), substituted “668(d)” for “661(c)(2)”, and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: “who is nominated for the joint specialty;”.
2001—Subsec. (i)(4)(E). Pub. L. 107–107, § 522(1), substituted “Except as provided in subparagraph (F), the joint task force” for “The joint task force”.
Subsec. (i)(4)(F). Pub. L. 107–107, § 522(2), added subpar. (F).
1999—Subsec. (i)(2)(A). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted “February 10, 1996” for “the date of the enactment of this subsection” in introductory provisions.
1996—Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(f), struck out “(after fiscal year 1990)” after “any fiscal year”.
Subsec. (e)(2)(C). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(1), added subpar. (E).
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(A), substituted “completion of any of the following:” for “completion of—” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), (D), substituted “A joint duty” for “a joint duty” and “subsection (a).” for “subsection (a);”.
Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), (D), substituted “A joint duty” for “a joint duty” and “subsection (c).” for “subsection (c);”.
Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(C), (D), substituted “Cumulative” for “cumulative” and “subsection (g).” for “subsection (g);”.
Subsec. (f)(4). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), (D), substituted “A joint duty” for “a joint duty” and “any time).” for “any time); or”.
Subsec. (f)(5). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), substituted “A joint duty” for “a joint duty”.
Subsec. (f)(6). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(E), added par. (6).
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(b), added subsec. (i).
1988—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(1)(A), substituted “two years” for “three years”.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(1)(B), substituted “three years” for “three and one-half years”.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(2), substituted “is” for “has been” and struck out “before such assignment begins” after “specialty”.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(3), inserted “which is less than the applicable standard prescribed in subsection (a)” after “Hawaii”.
Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 100–456, § 517(b), substituted “12½ percent” for “10 percent”.
Subsec. (f)(4), (5). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(4), added pars. (4) and (5).
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(5), substituted “shall be excluded if the officer served less than 10 months in that assignment” for “shall be excluded—
“(A) if the officer served less than 10 months in that assignment; and
“(B) to the extent that the assignment was served more than eight years before the date of computation of the cumulative service.”
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(6), added subsec. (h).
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: “The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) in the case of any officer, but the Secretary shall ensure that the average length of joint duty assignments meets the standards prescribed in that subsection.”
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c), “Certain officers with critical combat operations skills”, which read as follows: “Joint duty assignments of less than the period prescribed by subsection (a), but not less than two years, may be authorized for the purposes of section 661(c)(2) of this title. Such an assignment may not be counted for the purposes of determining the average length of joint duty assignments under subsection (b).”
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsec. (d) and struck out former subsec. (d), “Exception”, which read as follows:
“(1) Subsection (a) does not apply in the case of an officer who fails to complete a joint duty assignment as the result of—
“(A) retirement;
“(B) separation from active duty; or
“(C) suspension from duty under section 155(f)(2) or 164(g) of this title.
“(2) In computing the average length of joint duty assignments for purposes of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall exclude joint duty assignments not completed because of a reason specified in paragraph (1).”
Subsecs. (e) to (g). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsecs. (e) to (g).
