15 USC § 1115 - Registration on principal register as evidence of exclusive right to use mark; defenses
(a)
Evidentiary value; defenses
Any registration issued under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or of a mark registered on the principal register provided by this chapter and owned by a party to an action shall be admissible in evidence and shall be prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of the registrant’s ownership of the mark, and of the registrant’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the registration subject to any conditions or limitations stated therein, but shall not preclude another person from proving any legal or equitable defense or defect, including those set forth in subsection (b) of this section, which might have been asserted if such mark had not been registered.
(b)
Incontestability; defenses
To the extent that the right to use the registered mark has become incontestable under section
1065 of this title, the registration shall be conclusive evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of the registrant’s ownership of the mark, and of the registrant’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce. Such conclusive evidence shall relate to the exclusive right to use the mark on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the affidavit filed under the provisions of section
1065 of this title, or in the renewal application filed under the provisions of section
1059 of this title if the goods or services specified in the renewal are fewer in number, subject to any conditions or limitations in the registration or in such affidavit or renewal application. Such conclusive evidence of the right to use the registered mark shall be subject to proof of infringement as defined in section
1114 of this title, and shall be subject to the following defenses or defects:
(3)
That the registered mark is being used by or with the permission of the registrant or a person in privity with the registrant, so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used; or
(4)
That the use of the name, term, or device charged to be an infringement is a use, otherwise than as a mark, of the party’s individual name in his own business, or of the individual name of anyone in privity with such party, or of a term or device which is descriptive of and used fairly and in good faith only to describe the goods or services of such party, or their geographic origin; or
(5)
That the mark whose use by a party is charged as an infringement was adopted without knowledge of the registrant’s prior use and has been continuously used by such party or those in privity with him from a date prior to
(A)
the date of constructive use of the mark established pursuant to section
1057
(c) of this title,
(B)
the registration of the mark under this chapter if the application for registration is filed before the effective date of the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, or
(C)
publication of the registered mark under subsection (c) ofsection
1062 of this title: Provided, however, That this defense or defect shall apply only for the area in which such continuous prior use is proved; or
(6)
That the mark whose use is charged as an infringement was registered and used prior to the registration under this chapter or publication under subsection (c) ofsection
1062 of this title of the registered mark of the registrant, and not abandoned: Provided, however, That this defense or defect shall apply only for the area in which the mark was used prior to such registration or such publication of the registrant’s mark; or
(a)
Evidentiary value; defenses
Any registration issued under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or of a mark registered on the principal register provided by this chapter and owned by a party to an action shall be admissible in evidence and shall be prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of the registrant’s ownership of the mark, and of the registrant’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the registration subject to any conditions or limitations stated therein, but shall not preclude another person from proving any legal or equitable defense or defect, including those set forth in subsection (b) of this section, which might have been asserted if such mark had not been registered.
(b)
Incontestability; defenses
To the extent that the right to use the registered mark has become incontestable under section
1065 of this title, the registration shall be conclusive evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of the registrant’s ownership of the mark, and of the registrant’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce. Such conclusive evidence shall relate to the exclusive right to use the mark on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the affidavit filed under the provisions of section
1065 of this title, or in the renewal application filed under the provisions of section
1059 of this title if the goods or services specified in the renewal are fewer in number, subject to any conditions or limitations in the registration or in such affidavit or renewal application. Such conclusive evidence of the right to use the registered mark shall be subject to proof of infringement as defined in section
1114 of this title, and shall be subject to the following defenses or defects:
(3)
That the registered mark is being used by or with the permission of the registrant or a person in privity with the registrant, so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used; or
(4)
That the use of the name, term, or device charged to be an infringement is a use, otherwise than as a mark, of the party’s individual name in his own business, or of the individual name of anyone in privity with such party, or of a term or device which is descriptive of and used fairly and in good faith only to describe the goods or services of such party, or their geographic origin; or
(5)
That the mark whose use by a party is charged as an infringement was adopted without knowledge of the registrant’s prior use and has been continuously used by such party or those in privity with him from a date prior to
(A)
the date of constructive use of the mark established pursuant to section
1057
(c) of this title,
(B)
the registration of the mark under this chapter if the application for registration is filed before the effective date of the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, or
(C)
publication of the registered mark under subsection (c) ofsection
1062 of this title: Provided, however, That this defense or defect shall apply only for the area in which such continuous prior use is proved; or
(6)
That the mark whose use is charged as an infringement was registered and used prior to the registration under this chapter or publication under subsection (c) ofsection
1062 of this title of the registered mark of the registrant, and not abandoned: Provided, however, That this defense or defect shall apply only for the area in which the mark was used prior to such registration or such publication of the registrant’s mark; or
Source
(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title VI, § 33,60 Stat. 438; Pub. L. 87–772, § 18,Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 100–667, title I, § 128(a), (b),Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3944; Pub. L. 105–330, title II, § 201(a)(9),Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 3070; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13207(b)(7),Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1908.)
References in Text
Acts March 3, 1881, and February 20, 1905, referred to in subsec. (a), are acts Mar. 3, 1881, ch. 138, 21 Stat. 502 and Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, 33 Stat. 724, which were repealed insofar as inconsistent with this chapter by act July 5, 1946, ch. 540, § 46(a),60 Stat. 444. Act Feb. 20, 1905, was classified to sections
81 to
109 of this title.
The effective date of the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, referred to in subsec. (b)(5), is one year after Nov. 16, 1988. See section 136 ofPub. L. 100–667, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section
1051 of this title.
Prior Provisions
Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, §§ 16,
21,33 Stat. 728, 729.
Amendments
2002—Subsec. (b)(8). Pub. L. 107–273realigned margins.
1998—Subsec. (b)(8), (9). Pub. L. 105–330added par. (8) and redesignated former par. (8) as (9).
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–667, § 128(a), inserted “the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of the registrant’s ownership of the mark, and of the” after “facie evidence of”, inserted “or in connection with” after “in commerce on”, substituted “another person” for “an opposing party”, and inserted “, including those set forth in subsection (b) of this section,” after “or defect”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–667, § 128(b)(1), amended introductory provisions generally. Prior to amendment, introductory provisions read as follows: “If the right to use the registered mark has become incontestable under section
1065 of this title, the registration shall be conclusive evidence of the registrant’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the affidavit filed under the provisions of said section
1065 subject to any conditions or limitations stated therein except when one of the following defenses or defects is established:”.
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 100–667, § 128(b)(2), inserted “on or” after “goods or services”.
Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 100–667, § 128(b)(3), struck out “trade or service” after “than as a” and “to users” after “only to describe”.
Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 100–667, § 128(b)(4), substituted “(A) the date of constructive use of the mark established pursuant to section
1057
(c) of this title, (B) the registration of the mark under this chapter if the application for registration is filed before the effective date of the Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, or (C)” for “registration of the mark under this chapter or”.
Subsec. (b)(8). Pub. L. 100–667, § 128(b)(5), (6), added par. (8).
1962—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 87–772substituted “registration subject to” for “certificate subject to”, and struck out “certificate of” before “registration issued”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 87–772substituted “registration shall” for “certificate shall”, and “affidavit filed under the provisions of said section
1065” for “certificate” in text preceding par. (1), substituted “registrant or a person in privity with the registrant,” for “assignee”, and struck out “has been assigned and” after “registered mark” in par. (3), substituted “registration of the mark under this chapter or” for “the”, and struck out “(a) or” before “(c) of section
1062” in par. (5), inserted “registration under this chapter”, substituted “such registration or such” for “the date of”, and struck out “(a) or” before “(c) of section
1062”, “only where the said mark has been published pursuant to subsections (c) ofsection
1062 of this title and shall apply” after “defect shall apply”, and “under subsection (a) or (c) ofsection
1062 of this title” after “registrant’s mark”, in par. (6).
Effective Date of 1998 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–330effective Oct. 30, 1998, and applicable only to any civil action filed or proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office commenced on or after such date relating to the registration of a mark, see section 201(b) ofPub. L. 105–330, set out as a note under section
1051 of this title.
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–667effective one year after Nov. 16, 1988, see section 136 ofPub. L. 100–667, set out as a note under section
1051 of this title.
Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights
Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section
1051 of this title.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Wednesday, February 6, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 15 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.