Source
(Pub. L. 93–378, § 6, formerly, § 5,Aug. 17, 1974, 88 Stat. 477, renumbered § 6 and amended Pub. L. 94–588, §§ 2,
6,
12
(a),Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2949, 2952, 2958.)
References in Text
The Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960, referred to in subsecs. (e) and (g), is
Pub. L. 86–517, June 12, 1960,
74 Stat. 215, as amended, which is classified generally to sections
528 to
531 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
528 of this title and Tables.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (g)(1), is
Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970,
83 Stat. 852, as amended, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§ 4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
4321 of Title
42 and Tables.
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (a).
Pub. L. 94–588, § 12(a), substituted “section
4” for “section
3” in the original, which, because of the translation as “section
1602 of this title” required no change in text.
Subsecs. (c) to (m).
Pub. L. 94–588, § 6, added subsecs. (c) to (m).
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture under this subchapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section
1601 of this title.
Revision of Forest Plans
Pub. L. 111–88, div. A, title IV, § 410,Oct. 30, 2009,
123 Stat. 2957, provided that: “The Secretary of Agriculture shall not be considered to be in violation of subparagraph 6(f)(5)(A) of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (
16 U.S.C.
1604
(f)(5)(A)) solely because more than 15 years have passed without revision of the plan for a unit of the National Forest System. Nothing in this section exempts the Secretary from any other requirement of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (
16 U.S.C.
1600 et seq.) or any other law: Provided, That if the Secretary is not acting expeditiously and in good faith, within the funding available, to revise a plan for a unit of the National Forest System, this section shall be void with respect to such plan and a court of proper jurisdiction may order completion of the plan on an accelerated basis.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
Pub. L. 111–8, div. E, title IV, § 410,Mar. 11, 2009,
123 Stat. 746.
Pub. L. 110–161, div. F, title IV, § 410,Dec. 26, 2007,
121 Stat. 2146.
Pub. L. 109–54, title IV, § 415,Aug. 2, 2005,
119 Stat. 551.
Pub. L. 108–447, div. E, title III, § 320,Dec. 8, 2004,
118 Stat. 3097.
Pub. L. 108–108, title III, § 320,Nov. 10, 2003,
117 Stat. 1306.
Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title III, § 320, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat 274.
Pub. L. 107–63, title III, § 327,Nov. 5, 2001,
115 Stat. 470.
Expeditious Completion of Management Plans of Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management; Continuation of Existing Plans; Judicial Review
Pub. L. 101–121, title III, § 312,Oct. 23, 1989,
103 Stat. 743, provided that: “The Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management are to continue to complete as expeditiously as possible development of their respective Forest Land and Resource Management Plans to meet all applicable statutory requirements. Notwithstanding the date in section 6(c) of the NFMA (
16 U.S.C.
1600) [
16 U.S.C.
1604
(c)], the Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management under separate authority, may continue the management of lands within their jurisdiction under existing land and resource management plans pending the completion of new plans. Nothing shall limit judicial review of particular activities on these lands: Provided, however, That there shall be no challenges to any existing plan on the sole basis that the plan in its entirety is outdated, or in the case of the Bureau of Land Management, solely on the basis that the plan does not incorporate information available subsequent to the completion of the existing plan: Provided further, That any and all particular activities to be carried out under existing plans may nevertheless be challenged.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:
Pub. L. 100–446, title III, § 314,Sept. 27, 1988,
102 Stat. 1825.
Pub. L. 100–202, § 101(g) [title III, § 314], Dec. 22, 1987,
101 Stat. 1329–213, 1329–254.
Pub. L. 99–500, § 101(h) [title II], Oct. 18, 1986,
100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–268, and
Pub. L. 99–591, § 101(h) [title II], Oct. 30, 1986,
100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–268.