Source
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 555,46 Stat. 743; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, § 301(b),June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 287; Pub. L. 98–573, title II, § 211,Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2977; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, § 1908(b),Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1315; Pub. L. 101–382, title I, § 139(a)(1),Aug. 20, 1990, 104 Stat. 653; Pub. L. 104–295, § 29,Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3535; Pub. L. 106–36, title II, § 2417,June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 176; Pub. L. 106–476, title I, § 1454,Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2168.)
References in Text
For provisions relating to ports of entry established under section 1 of the Act of August 24, 1912 (
37 Stat. 434), referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(A), (C), see Prior Provisions note under section
1 of this title.
The date of enactment of the Omnibus Trade Act of 1987, referred to in subsec. (b)(3)(F)(ii)(II), probably means the date of enactment of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988,
Pub. L. 100–418, which was approved Aug. 23, 1988.
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, referred to in subsec. (b)(6), is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under section
1202 of this title.
Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 555,
42 Stat. 976. That section was superseded by section 555 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Prior provisions dealing with the subject matter of this section were contained in R.S. § 2958, authorizing cellars and vaults of stores for storage of wines and distilled spirits, and yards for storage of coal, etc., to be constituted bonded warehouses; section
2959, authorizing parts of buildings to be bonded for the storage of grain; section
2960, requiring private warehouses to be used solely for the storage of warehoused merchandise, and be approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, and be in charge of a proper officer of the customs, etc.; section
2961 requiring bonds to hold the United States harmless, and providing that imports deposited in warehouses should be at the risk and expense of the owner or importer; section
2968, authorizing the extension of warehouse privileges to the port of Albany; and section
2988, as amended by act Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, § 1,
19 Stat. 247, requiring collectors to make reports of merchandise in warehouses. All of these sections were repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 642,
42 Stat. 989.
Amendments
2000—Subsec. (c).
Pub. L. 106–476added subsec. (c).
1999—Subsec. (b)(2)(B), (C).
Pub. L. 106–36substituted “; or” for period at end of subpar. (B) and added subpar. (C).
1996—Subsec. (b)(6).
Pub. L. 104–295designated existing provisions as subpar. (A), substituted “Except as provided in subparagraph (B), merchandise” for “Merchandise”, and added subpar. (B).
1990—Subsec. (b)(6).
Pub. L. 101–382, which directed substitution of “subchapter IV of chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States” for “subpart A of part 2 of schedule 8 of the Tariff schedules of the United States”, was executed by making the substitution for “subpart A of part 2 of schedule 8 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States” to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1988—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 100–418amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: “If a State or local governmental authority, incident to its jurisdiction over any airport, seaport, or other exit point facility, requires that a concession or other form of approval be obtained from that authority with respect to the operation of a duty-free sales enterprise under which merchandise is delivered to such facility for exportation, merchandise incident to such operation may not be withdrawn from a bonded warehouse and transferred to such facility unless the operator of the duty-free sales enterprise demonstrates to the Secretary of the Treasury that the concession or approval required for the enterprise has been obtained. For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘duty-free sales enterprise’ means an entity that sells, in less than wholesale quantities, duty-free or tax-free merchandise that is delivered from a bonded warehouse to an airport, seaport, or point of exit from the United States for exportation by, or on behalf of, individuals departing from the United States.”
1984—
Pub. L. 98–573designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted “Subject to subsection (b) of this section, buildings” for “Buildings”, and added subsec. (b).
1970—
Pub. L. 91–271substituted reference to appropriate customs officer for reference to collector.
Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 106–476, except as otherwise provided, applicable with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after the 15th day after Nov. 9, 2000, see section 1471 of
Pub. L. 106–476, set out as a note under section
58c of this title.
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Section 1908(c) of
Pub. L. 100–418provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 23, 1988].”
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 98–573effective on 15th day after Oct. 30, 1984, see section 214(a), (b) of
Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section
1304 of this title.
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by
Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of
Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section
1500 of this title.
Duty-Free Sales Enterprises; Findings
Section 1908(a) of
Pub. L. 100–418provided that: “The Congress finds that—
“(1) duty-free sales enterprises play a significant role in attracting international passengers to the United States and thereby their operations favorably affect our balance of payments;
“(2) concession fees derived from the operations of authorized duty-free sales enterprises constitute an important source of revenue for the State, local and other governmental authorities that collect such fees;
“(3) there is inadequate statutory and regulatory recognition of, and guidelines for the operation of, duty-free sales enterprises; and
“(4) there is a need to encourage uniformity and consistency of regulation of duty-free sales enterprises.”