(a) Definitions.— In this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) Environmental review process.— The term “environmental review process” means the process for preparing for a project an environmental impact statement, environmental assessment, categorical exclusion, or other document prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(2) Planning product.— The term “planning product” means a detailed and timely decision, analysis, study, or other documented information that—
(A)is the result of an evaluation or decisionmaking process carried out during transportation planning, including a detailed corridor plan or a transportation plan developed under section
134 that fully analyzes impacts on mobility, adjacent communities, and the environment;
(B)is intended to be carried into the transportation project development process; and
(C)has been approved by the State, all local and tribal governments where the project is located, and by any relevant metropolitan planning organization.
(3) Project.— The term “project” has the meaning given the term in section
(4) Project sponsor.— The term “project sponsor” has the meaning given the term in section
(b) Adoption of Planning Products for Use in NEPA Proceedings.—
(1) In general.— Subject to the conditions set forth in subsection (d), the Federal lead agency for a project may adopt and use a planning product in proceedings relating to any class of action in the environmental review process of the project.
(2) Identification.— When the Federal lead agency makes a determination to adopt and use a planning product, the Federal lead agency shall identify those agencies that participated in the development of the planning products.
(3) Partial adoption of planning products.— The Federal lead agency may adopt a planning product under paragraph (1) in its entirety or may select portions for adoption.
(4) Timing.— A determination under paragraph (1) with respect to the adoption of a planning product may be made at the time the lead agencies decide the appropriate scope of environmental review for the project but may also occur later in the environmental review process, as appropriate.
(1) Planning decisions.— Planning decisions that may be adopted pursuant to this section include—
(A)whether tolling, private financial assistance, or other special financial measures are necessary to implement the project;
(B)a decision with respect to modal choice, including a decision to implement corridor or subarea study recommendations to advance different modal solutions as separate projects with independent utility;
(C)a basic description of the environmental setting;
(D)a decision with respect to methodologies for analysis; and
(E)an identification of programmatic level mitigation for potential impacts that the Federal lead agency, in consultation with Federal, State, local, and tribal resource agencies, determines are most effectively addressed at a regional or national program level, including—
(i)system-level measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts of proposed transportation investments on environmental resources, including regional ecosystem and water resources; and
(ii)potential mitigation activities, locations, and investments.
(2) Planning analyses.— Planning analyses that may be adopted pursuant to this section include studies with respect to—
(B)regional development and growth;
(C)local land use, growth management, and development;
(D)population and employment;
(E)natural and built environmental conditions;
(F)environmental resources and environmentally sensitive areas;
(G)potential environmental effects, including the identification of resources of concern and potential cumulative effects on those resources, identified as a result of a statewide or regional cumulative effects assessment; and
(H)mitigation needs for a proposed action, or for programmatic level mitigation, for potential effects that the Federal lead agency determines are most effectively addressed at a regional or national program level.
(d) Conditions.— Adoption and use of a planning product under this section is subject to a determination by the Federal lead agency, with the concurrence of other participating agencies with relevant expertise and project sponsors as appropriate, and with an opportunity for public notice and comment and consideration of those comments by the Federal lead agency, that the following conditions have been met:
(1)The planning product was developed through a planning process conducted pursuant to applicable Federal law.
(2)The planning product was developed by engaging in active consultation with appropriate Federal and State resource agencies and Indian tribes.
(3)The planning process included broad multidisciplinary consideration of systems-level or corridor-wide transportation needs and potential effects, including effects on the human and natural environment.
(4)During the planning process, notice was provided through publication or other means to Federal, State, local, and tribal governments that might have an interest in the proposed project, and to members of the general public, of the planning products that the planning process might produce and that might be relied on during any subsequent environmental review process, and such entities have been provided an appropriate opportunity to participate in the planning process leading to such planning product.
(5)After initiation of the environmental review process, but prior to determining whether to rely on and use the planning product, the lead Federal agency has made documentation relating to the planning product available to Federal, State, local, and tribal governments that may have an interest in the proposed action, and to members of the general public, and has considered any resulting comments.
(6)There is no significant new information or new circumstance that has a reasonable likelihood of affecting the continued validity or appropriateness of the planning product.
(7)The planning product has a rational basis and is based on reliable and reasonably current data and reasonable and scientifically acceptable methodologies.
(8)The planning product is documented in sufficient detail to support the decision or the results of the analysis and to meet requirements for use of the information in the environmental review process.
(9)The planning product is appropriate for adoption and use in the environmental review process for the project.
(10)The planning product was approved not later than 5 years prior to date on which the information is adopted pursuant to this section.
(e) Effect of Adoption.— Any planning product adopted by the Federal lead agency in accordance with this section may be incorporated directly into an environmental review process document or other environmental document and may be relied upon and used by other Federal agencies in carrying out reviews of the project.
(f) Rules of Construction.—
(1) In general.— This section shall not be construed to make the environmental review process applicable to the transportation planning process conducted under this title and chapter
53 of title
(2) Transportation planning activities.— Initiation of the environmental review process as a part of, or concurrently with, transportation planning activities does not subject transportation plans and programs to the environmental review process.
(3) Planning products.— This section shall not be construed to affect the use of planning products in the environmental review process pursuant to other authorities under any other provision of law or to restrict the initiation of the environmental review process during planning.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§ 4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
4321 of Title
42 and Tables.
Section effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) ofPub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section
101 of this title.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday, August 13, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.