25 U.S. Code § 1756 - Practice and procedure

(a) Constitutionality
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the constitutionality of this subchapter may not be drawn into question in any action unless such question has been raised in—
(1) a pleading contained in a complaint filed before the end of the one-hundred-and-eighty-day period beginning on October 18, 1983, or
(2) an answer contained in a reply to a complaint before the end of such period.
(b) Jurisdiction
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, exclusive jurisdiction of any action in which the constitutionality of this subchapter is drawn into question is vested in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.
(c) Removal of actions
Any action to which subsection (a) of this section applies and which is brought in the court of any State may be removed by the defendant to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.
(d) Jurisdictional acts; implied consent to sue the United States
Except as provided in this subchapter, no provision of this subchapter shall be construed to constitute a jurisdictional act, to confer jurisdiction to sue, or to grant implied consent to any Indian, Indian nation, or tribe or band of Indians to sue the United States or any of its officers with respect to the claims extinguished by the operation of this subchapter.

Source

(Pub. L. 98–134, § 7,Oct. 18, 1983, 97 Stat. 855.)
Codification

In subsec. (a)(1), “October 18, 1983” substituted for “the date of the enactment of this Act”, meaning the date of approval of Pub. L. 98–134.

 

LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.