26 USC § 7454 - Burden of proof in fraud, foundation manager, and transferee cases
(a)
Fraud
In any proceeding involving the issue whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with intent to evade tax, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary.
(b)
Foundation managers
In any proceeding involving the issue whether a foundation manager (as defined in section
4946
(b)) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section
4941), participated in an investment which jeopardizes the carrying out of exempt purposes (within the meaning of section
4944), or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section
4945), or whether the trustee of a trust described in section
501
(c)(21) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section
4951) or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section
4952), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4955
(f)(2)) has “knowingly” agreed to the making of a political expenditure (within the meaning of section
4955),,
[1]
or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4912
(d)(2)) has “knowingly” agreed to the making of disqualifying lobbying expenditures within the meaning of section
4912
(b), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4958
(f)(2)) has “knowingly” participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section
4958
(c)), the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary.
[1] So in original.
(a)
Fraud
In any proceeding involving the issue whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with intent to evade tax, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary.
(b)
Foundation managers
In any proceeding involving the issue whether a foundation manager (as defined in section
4946
(b)) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section
4941), participated in an investment which jeopardizes the carrying out of exempt purposes (within the meaning of section
4944), or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section
4945), or whether the trustee of a trust described in section
501
(c)(21) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section
4951) or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section
4952), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4955
(f)(2)) has “knowingly” agreed to the making of a political expenditure (within the meaning of section
4955),,
[1]
or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4912
(d)(2)) has “knowingly” agreed to the making of disqualifying lobbying expenditures within the meaning of section
4912
(b), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4958
(f)(2)) has “knowingly” participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section
4958
(c)), the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary.
[1] So in original.
Source
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 91–172, title I, § 101(j)(57),Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A),Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 95–227, § 4(d)(7),Feb. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 23; Pub. L. 96–222, title I, § 108(b)(3)(B),Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 226; Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §§ 10712(c)(6),
10714(b),Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–467, 1330–471; Pub. L. 104–168, title XIII, § 1311(c)(5),July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1478; Pub. L. 104–188, title I, § 1704(t)(43),Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1889.)
Amendments
Pub. L. 104–168inserted “or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4958
(f)(2)) has ‘knowingly’ participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section
4958
(c)),” after “section
4912
(b),”.
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–203, § 10714(b), substituted “, or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4912
(d)(2)) has ‘knowingly’ agreed to the making of disqualifying lobbying expenditures within the meaning of section
4912
(b), the burden of proof” for “the burden of proof”.
Pub. L. 100–203, § 10712(c)(6), substituted “or whether an organization manager (as defined in section
4955
(e)(2)) has ‘knowingly’ agreed to the making of a political expenditure (within the meaning of section
4955), the burden of proof” for “the burden of proof”.
1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–227inserted provision relating to trustees of a trust described under section
502
(c)(21) of this title.
1976—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 94–455struck out “or his delegate” after “Secretary”.
1969—Pub. L. 91–172inserted “, foundation manager” in section catchline.
Subsecs (b), (c). Pub. L. 91–172added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–168applicable to excess benefit transactions occurring on or after Sept. 14, 1995, and not applicable to any benefit arising from a transaction pursuant to any written contract which was binding on Sept. 13, 1995, and at all times thereafter before such transaction occurred, see section 1311(d)(1), (2) ofPub. L. 104–168, set out as a note under section
4955 of this title.
Effective Date of 1987 Amendment
Amendment by section 10712(c)(6) ofPub. L. 100–203applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 22, 1987, see section 10712(d) ofPub. L. 100–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section
4955 of this title.
Amendment by section 10714(b) ofPub. L. 100–203applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 22, 1987, see section 10714(e) ofPub. L. 100–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section
4912 of this title.
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–222effective as if included in the provisions of the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–227, see section 108(b)(4) ofPub. L. 96–222, set out as a note under section
192 of this title.
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–227applicable with respect to contributions, acts, and expenditures made after Dec. 31, 1977, in and for taxable years beginning after such date, see section 4(f) ofPub. L. 95–227, set out as an Effective Date note under section
192 of this title.
Effective Date of 1969 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–172effective Jan. 1, 1970, see section 101(k)(1) ofPub. L. 91–172, set out as an Effective Date note under section
4940 of this title.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Friday, May 3, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 26 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.