28 USC § 1364 - Direct actions against insurers of members of diplomatic missions and their families
(a)
The district courts shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy, of any civil action commenced by any person against an insurer who by contract has insured an individual, who is, or was at the time of the tortious act or omission, a member of a mission (within the meaning of section 2(3) of the Diplomatic Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 254a
(3))) or a member of the family of such a member of a mission, or an individual described in section 19 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of February 13, 1946, against liability for personal injury, death, or damage to property.
(b)
Any direct action brought against an insurer under subsection (a) shall be tried without a jury, but shall not be subject to the defense that the insured is immune from suit, that the insured is an indispensable party, or in the absence of fraud or collusion, that the insured has violated a term of the contract, unless the contract was cancelled before the claim arose.
(a)
The district courts shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy, of any civil action commenced by any person against an insurer who by contract has insured an individual, who is, or was at the time of the tortious act or omission, a member of a mission (within the meaning of section 2(3) of the Diplomatic Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 254a
(3))) or a member of the family of such a member of a mission, or an individual described in section 19 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of February 13, 1946, against liability for personal injury, death, or damage to property.
(b)
Any direct action brought against an insurer under subsection (a) shall be tried without a jury, but shall not be subject to the defense that the insured is immune from suit, that the insured is an indispensable party, or in the absence of fraud or collusion, that the insured has violated a term of the contract, unless the contract was cancelled before the claim arose.
Source
(Added Pub. L. 95–393, § 7(a),Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 809; amended Pub. L. 97–241, title II, § 203(b)(4),Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 100–204, title I, § 138(a),Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1347.)
Codification
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–204inserted “, or was at the time of the tortious act or omission,” after “who is”.
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–241substituted “within the meaning of section 2(3) of the Diplomatic Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 254a
(3))” for “as defined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations”.
Effective Date of 1987 Amendment
Section 138(b) ofPub. L. 100–204provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to the first tortious act or omission occurring after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 22, 1987].”
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–241effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 204 ofPub. L. 97–241, set out as an Effective Date note under section
4301 of Title
22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
Effective Date
Section effective at end of ninety-day period beginning on Sept. 30, 1978, see section 9 ofPub. L. 95–393, set out as a note under section
254a of Title
22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Friday, May 3, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 28 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.