Source
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 963; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §§ 107,
108,63 Stat. 104; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, § 248,Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672; Pub. L. 102–198, § 12,Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1627; Pub. L. 111–16, § 6(3),May 7, 2009, 123 Stat. 1608; Pub. L. 112–62, § 3,Nov. 29, 2011, 125 Stat. 757.)
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 227a,
230, andsection
1142 of title
26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code (Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, § 11,
26 Stat. 829; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 129,
36 Stat. 1134; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, § 8(c),
43 Stat. 940; Feb. 28, 1927, ch. 228,
44 Stat. 1261; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, § 1,
45 Stat. 54; Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, § 1142,
53 Stat. 165; Oct. 21, 1942, ch. 619, title V, § 504(a), (c),
56 Stat. 957).
Section consolidates sections
227a and
230 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with section
1142 of title
26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code. Other provisions of such section
227a are incorporated in section
1292 of this title.
Section
227a of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided a time limit of 30 days for appeals from patent-infringement decisions, and section
230 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., permitted 3 months for appeals generally. The revised section adopts the 30-day limit in conformity with recommendations of members of the Judicial Conference of the United States and proposed amendment to Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Section
1142 of title
26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided for 3 months within which to petition for appeal from a decision of The Tax Court. The second paragraph of the revised section reduces this to 60 days for reasons explained above. Other provisions of said section
1142 making a distinction between decisions before and after June 6, 1932, were omitted as executed.
Words “in an action, suit, or proceeding of a civil nature” were added in view of Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure prescribing a different limitation for criminal appeals.
Words “notice of appeal is filed” were substituted for provisions of sections
230 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and 1142 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., for petition and allowance of appeal in order to eliminate the useless paper work involved in a pro forma application for appeal and perfunctory allowance of the same. The effect of the section is to require appeals to the courts of appeals in all cases to be taken by filing notice of appeal. See Rule 73(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The case of Mosier v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, C.C.A. 1942, 132 F.2d 710, holds that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure changing the method of “taking” an appeal, do not affect the time limitation prescribed by section
230 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Word “order” was added, in two places, after “judgment” so as to make the section cover all appeals of which the courts of appeals have jurisdiction, as set forth in section
1291 et seq. of this title.
The last paragraph was added in conformity with section
48 of title
11, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Bankruptcy, and other sections of that title regulating appellate procedure in bankruptcy matters.
The third paragraph was inserted to conform to the existing practice in Admiralty upon the recommendation of the Committee on the Federal Courts of the New York County Lawyers Association.
The time for appeal to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in patent and trade-mark cases is governed by section
89 of title
15, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Commerce and Trade, and section
60 of title
35, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Patents, and Rule 25 of the Rules of such court, and, in customs cases, by section
2601 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
By Senate amendment, all provisions relating to the Tax Court were eliminated. Therefore, section
1142 of title
26, U.S.C., Internal Revenue Code, was not one of the sources of this section as finally enacted. However, no change in the text of this section was necessary. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
1949 Act
This amendment to section
2107 of title
28, U.S.C., restores the former 15-day limitation of time within which to appeal from an interlocutory order in admiralty.
This amendment eliminates as surplusage the words “in any such action, suit or proceeding,” from the fourth paragraph of section
2107 of title
28, U.S.C., and corrects a typographical error in the same paragraph.
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 112–62added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: “In any such action, suit or proceeding in which the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, the time as to all parties shall be sixty days from such entry.”
2009—Subsec. (c).
Pub. L. 111–16substituted “within 14 days” for “within 7 days” in concluding provisions.
1991—
Pub. L. 102–198designated first and second pars. as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, added subsec. (c), designated fifth par. as subsec. (d), and struck out third and fourth pars. which read as follows:
“In any action, suit or proceeding in admiralty, the notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the entry of the order, judgment or decree appealed from, if it is a final decision, and within fifteen days after its entry if it is an interlocutory decree.
“The district court may extend the time for appeal not exceeding thirty days from the expiration of the original time herein prescribed, upon a showing of excusable neglect based on failure of a party to learn of the entry of the judgment, order or decree.”
1978—
Pub. L. 95–598directed the amendment of section by inserting “or the bankruptcy court” after “district court” and by striking out the final par., which amendment did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of
Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section
101 of Title
11, Bankruptcy.
1949—Act May 24, 1949, restored, in third par., the 15-day limitation of time within which to appeal from an interlocutory order in admiralty, and in fourth par., substituted “The district court may” for “The district court, in any such action, suit, or proceeding, may” and corrected spelling of “excusable”.
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–62, § 4,Nov. 29, 2011,
125 Stat. 757, provided that: “The amendment made by this Act [amending this section] shall take effect on December 1, 2011.”
Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 111–16effective Dec. 1, 2009, see section 7 of
Pub. L. 111–16, set out as a note under section
109 of Title
11, Bankruptcy.
Findings
Pub. L. 112–62, § 2,Nov. 29, 2011,
125 Stat. 756, provided that: “Congress finds that—
“(1) section
2107 of title
28, United States Code, and rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that the time to appeal for most civil actions is 30 days, but that the appeal time for all parties is 60 days when the parties in the civil action include the United States, a United States officer, or a United States agency;
“(2) the 60-day period should apply if one of the parties is—
“(A) the United States;
“(B) a United States agency;
“(C) a United States officer or employee sued in an official capacity; or
“(D) a current or former United States officer or employee sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties performed on behalf of the United States;
“(3) section
2107 of title
28, United States Code, and rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (as amended to take effect on December 1, 2011, in accordance with section 2074 of that title) should uniformly apply the 60-day period to those civil actions relating to a Federal officer or employee sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with Federal duties;
“(4) the civil actions to which the 60-day periods should apply include all civil actions in which a legal officer of the United States represents the relevant officer or employee when the judgment or order is entered or in which the United States files the appeal for that officer or employee; and
“(5) the application of the 60-day period in section
2107 of title
28, United States Code, and rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure—
“(A) is not limited to civil actions in which representation of the United States is provided by the Department of Justice; and
“(B) includes all civil actions in which the representation of the United States is provided by a Federal legal officer acting in an official capacity, such as civil actions in which a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate or the House of Representatives is represented by the Office of Senate Legal Counsel or the Office of General Counsel of the House of Representatives.”