35 USC § 104 - Invention made abroad
(a)
In General.—
(1)
Proceedings.—
In proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office, in the courts, and before any other competent authority, an applicant for a patent, or a patentee, may not establish a date of invention by reference to knowledge or use thereof, or other activity with respect thereto, in a foreign country other than a NAFTA country or a WTO member country, except as provided in sections
119 and
365.
(2)
Rights.—
If an invention was made by a person, civil or military—
(A)
while domiciled in the United States, and serving in any other country in connection with operations by or on behalf of the United States,
(B)
while domiciled in a NAFTA country and serving in another country in connection with operations by or on behalf of that NAFTA country, or
(C)
while domiciled in a WTO member country and serving in another country in connection with operations by or on behalf of that WTO member country,
that person shall be entitled to the same rights of priority in the United States with respect to such invention as if such invention had been made in the United States, that NAFTA country, or that WTO member country, as the case may be.
(3)
Use of information.—
To the extent that any information in a NAFTA country or a WTO member country concerning knowledge, use, or other activity relevant to proving or disproving a date of invention has not been made available for use in a proceeding in the Patent and Trademark Office, a court, or any other competent authority to the same extent as such information could be made available in the United States, the Director, court, or such other authority shall draw appropriate inferences, or take other action permitted by statute, rule, or regulation, in favor of the party that requested the information in the proceeding.
(a)
In General.—
(1)
Proceedings.—
In proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office, in the courts, and before any other competent authority, an applicant for a patent, or a patentee, may not establish a date of invention by reference to knowledge or use thereof, or other activity with respect thereto, in a foreign country other than a NAFTA country or a WTO member country, except as provided in sections
119 and
365 of this title.
(2)
Rights.—
If an invention was made by a person, civil or military—
(A)
while domiciled in the United States, and serving in any other country in connection with operations by or on behalf of the United States,
(B)
while domiciled in a NAFTA country and serving in another country in connection with operations by or on behalf of that NAFTA country, or
(C)
while domiciled in a WTO member country and serving in another country in connection with operations by or on behalf of that WTO member country,
that person shall be entitled to the same rights of priority in the United States with respect to such invention as if such invention had been made in the United States, that NAFTA country, or that WTO member country, as the case may be.
(3)
Use of information.—
To the extent that any information in a NAFTA country or a WTO member country concerning knowledge, use, or other activity relevant to proving or disproving a date of invention has not been made available for use in a proceeding in the Patent and Trademark Office, a court, or any other competent authority to the same extent as such information could be made available in the United States, the Director, court, or such other authority shall draw appropriate inferences, or take other action permitted by statute, rule, or regulation, in favor of the party that requested the information in the proceeding.
Source
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 798; Pub. L. 93–596, § 1,Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 94–131, § 6,Nov. 14, 1975, 89 Stat. 691; Pub. L. 98–622, title IV, § 403(a),Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3392; Pub. L. 103–182, title III, § 331,Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2113; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, § 531(a),Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4982; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B),Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; (As amended Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j),Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)
Amendment of Section
Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j), (l),Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335, provided that, effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, this section is amended by striking “of this title” each place that term appears. See 2011 Amendment note below.
Repeal of Section
Pub. L. 112–29, § 3(d), (n),Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 287, 293, provided that, effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, this section is repealed.
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 109 (Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 910, 60 Stat. 943).
Language has been changed and the last sentence has been broadened to refer to persons serving in connection with operations by or on behalf of the United States, instead of solely in connection with the prosecution of the war.
References in Text
Section 2(4) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is classified to section
3301
(4) of Title
19, Customs Duties.
Section 2(10) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is classified to section
3501
(10) of Title
19.
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 112–29, 20(j), struck out “of this title” after “365”.
2002—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 107–273made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted “Director” for “Commissioner”.
1994—Pub. L. 103–465amended section generally, expanding scope of section to include WTO member countries along with NAFTA countries and defining term “WTO member country”.
1993—Pub. L. 103–182amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “In proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office and in the courts, an applicant for a patent, or a patentee, may not establish a date of invention by reference to knowledge or use thereof, or other activity with respect thereto, in a foreign country, except as provided in sections
119 and
365 of this title. Where an invention was made by a person, civil or military, while domiciled in the United States and serving in a foreign country in connection with operations by or on behalf of the United States, he shall be entitled to the same rights of priority with respect to such invention as if the same had been made in the United States.”
1984—Pub. L. 98–622substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”.
1975—Pub. L. 94–131inserted in exception provision reference to section
365 of this title relating to priority of applications having benefit of filing date of prior applications.
Pub. L. 93–596substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”.
Effective Date of Repeal
Repeal effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) ofPub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section
100 of this title.
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by section 20(j) ofPub. L. 112–29effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) ofPub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section
2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section
1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section
1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Section 531(b) ofPub. L. 103–465provided that:
“(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to all patent applications that are filed on or after the date that is 12 months after the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995].
“(2) Establishment of date.—An applicant for a patent, or a patentee, may not establish a date of invention for purposes of title 35, United States Code, that is earlier than 12 months after the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement with respect to the United States by reference to knowledge or use, or other activity, in a WTO member country, except as provided in sections 119 and 365 of such title.”
Effective Date of 1993 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–182applicable to all patent applications filed on or after Dec. 8, 1993, provided that applicant for a patent, or a patentee, may not establish a date of invention by reference to knowledge or use thereof, or other activity with respect thereto, in NAFTA country, except as provided in sections
119 and
365 of this title, that is earlier than Dec. 8, 1993, see section 335(b) ofPub. L. 103–182, set out as a note under section
1052 of Title
15, Commerce and Trade.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622effective on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 406(a) ofPub. L. 98–622, set out as a note under section
351 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendments
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–131effective Jan. 24, 1978, and applicable on and after that date to patent applications filed in the United States and to international applications, where applicable, see section 11 ofPub. L. 94–131, set out as an Effective Date note under section
351 of this title.
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 ofPub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section
1111 of Title
15, Commerce and Trade.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Wednesday, February 6, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 35 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.