41 U.S. Code § 4705 - Protection of contractor employees from reprisal for disclosure of certain information

Status message

There is 1 Update Pending. Select the tab below to view.
(a) Definitions.— In this section:
(1) Contract.— The term “contract” means a contract awarded by the head of an executive agency.
(2) Contractor.— The term “contractor” means a person awarded a contract with an executive agency.
(3) Inspector general.— The term “Inspector General” means an Inspector General appointed under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).
(b) Prohibition of Reprisals.— An employee of a contractor may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a Member of Congress or an authorized official of an executive agency or the Department of Justice information relating to a substantial violation of law related to a contract (including the competition for, or negotiation of, a contract).
(c) Investigation of Complaints.— An individual who believes that the individual has been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by subsection (b) may submit a complaint to the Inspector General of the executive agency. Unless the Inspector General determines that the complaint is frivolous, the Inspector General shall investigate the complaint and, on completion of the investigation, submit a report of the findings of the investigation to the individual, the contractor concerned, and the head of the agency. If the executive agency does not have an Inspector General, the duties of the Inspector General under this section shall be performed by an official designated by the head of the executive agency.
(d) Remedy and Enforcement Authority.—
(1) Actions contractor may be ordered to take.— If the head of an executive agency determines that a contractor has subjected an individual to a reprisal prohibited by subsection (b), the head of the executive agency may take one or more of the following actions:
(A) Abatement.— Order the contractor to take affirmative action to abate the reprisal.
(B) Reinstatement.— Order the contractor to reinstate the individual to the position that the individual held before the reprisal, together with the compensation (including back pay), employment benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment that would apply to the individual in that position if the reprisal had not been taken.
(C) Payment.— Order the contractor to pay the complainant an amount equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and expert witnesses’ fees) that the complainant reasonably incurred for, or in connection with, bringing the complaint regarding the reprisal, as determined by the head of the executive agency.
(2) Enforcement order.— When a contractor fails to comply with an order issued under paragraph (1), the head of the executive agency shall file an action for enforcement of the order in the United States district court for a district in which the reprisal was found to have occurred. In an action brought under this paragraph, the court may grant appropriate relief, including injunctive relief and compensatory and exemplary damages.
(3) Review of enforcement order.— A person adversely affected or aggrieved by an order issued under paragraph (1) may obtain review of the order’s conformance with this subsection, and regulations issued to carry out this section, in the United States court of appeals for a circuit in which the reprisal is alleged in the order to have occurred. A petition seeking review must be filed no more than 60 days after the head of the agency issues the order. Review shall conform to chapter 7 of title 5.
(e) Scope of Section.— This section does not—
(1) authorize the discharge of, demotion of, or discrimination against an employee for a disclosure other than a disclosure protected by subsection (b); or
(2) modify or derogate from a right or remedy otherwise available to the employee.
(f) Four-year Suspension of Effectiveness While Pilot Program Is in Effect.— While section 4712 of this title is in effect, this section shall not be in effect.

Source

(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3,Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3796; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 828(c),Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1841.)

Historical and Revision Notes
Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large)
4705(a)
41:265(e).
June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, § 315, as added Pub. L. 103–355, title VI, § 6006, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3365; Pub. L. 104–106, title XLIII, § 4321(e)(8), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 675.
4705(b)
41:265(a).
4705(c)
41:265(b).
4705(d)
41:265(c).
4705(e)
41:265(d).

In subsection (d)(2), the word “contractor” is substituted for “person” for clarity and for consistency with subsection (d)(1).
References in Text

The Inspector General Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), is Pub. L. 95–452, Oct. 12, 1978, 92 Stat. 1101, which is set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Amendments

2013—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 112–239added subsec. (f).

The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.

The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday, August 13, 2013

An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.

41 USCDescription of ChangeSession YearPublic LawStatutes at Large
§ 47052012112-239 [Sec.] 828(c)126 Stat. 1841

 

LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.