The Attorney General may award grants to not more than 15 chronic high intensive crime areas to develop comprehensive model crime prevention programs that—
(A)involve and utilize a broad spectrum of community resources, including nonprofit community organizations, law enforcement organizations, and appropriate State and Federal agencies, including the State educational agencies;
(B)attempt to relieve conditions that encourage crime; and
(C)provide meaningful and lasting alternatives to involvement in crime.
(2) Consultation with the Ounce of Prevention Council
The Attorney General may consult with the Ounce of Prevention Council in awarding grants under paragraph (1).
In awarding grants under subsection (a) of this section, the Attorney General shall give priority to proposals that—
(1)are innovative in approach to the prevention of crime in a specific area;
(2)vary in approach to ensure that comparisons of different models may be made; and
(3)coordinate crime prevention programs funded under this program with other existing Federal programs to address the overall needs of communities that benefit from grants received under this subchapter.
This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), was in the original “this title”, meaning title III of Pub. L. 103–322, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1836, which enacted this subchapter, sections
3796ff–4 of this title, and sections
6720 of Title
31, Money and Finance, amended sections
3797 of this title, sections
2512 of Title
16, Conservation, and section
3621 of Title
18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section
13701 of this title and sections
6702 of Title
31. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Tables.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday, August 13, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.