Source
(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 302, as added Pub. L. 96–157, § 2,Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1176; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 605(b),Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2079; Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6092(a),Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4339; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330001(h)(2),Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2139; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1115(a),Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3103; Pub. L. 111–211, title II, § 251(b),July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2297.)
References in Text
This Act, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (c)(11), is
Pub. L. 90–351, June 19, 1968,
82 Stat. 197, known as the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
3711 of this title and Tables.
Prior Provisions
A prior section
3732,
Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 302,June 19, 1968,
82 Stat. 200;
Pub. L. 93–83, § 2,Aug. 6, 1973,
87 Stat. 201;
Pub. L. 94–503, title I, § 110,Oct. 15, 1976,
90 Stat. 2412, related to establishment of State planning agencies to develop comprehensive State plans for grants for law enforcement and criminal justice purposes, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by
Pub. L. 96–157.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (c)(3) to (6).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(A), inserted “tribal,” after “State,” wherever appearing.
Subsec. (c)(7).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(B), inserted “and in Indian country” after “States”.
Subsec. (c)(9).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(C), substituted “Federal Government and State and tribal governments” for “Federal and State Governments”.
Subsec. (c)(10), (11).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(D), inserted “, tribal,” after “State”.
Subsec. (c)(13).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(E), inserted “, Indian tribes,” after “States”.
Subsec. (c)(17).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(F), substituted “activities at the Federal, State, tribal, and local” for “activities at the Federal, State and local” and “generated by Federal, State, tribal, and local” for “generated by Federal, State, and local”.
Subsec. (c)(18).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(G), substituted “State, tribal, and local” for “State and local”.
Subsec. (c)(19).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(H), inserted “and tribal” after “State” in two places.
Subsec. (c)(20).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(I), inserted “, tribal,” after “State”.
Subsec. (c)(22).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(1)(J), inserted “, tribal,” after “Federal”.
Subsec. (d).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(2), designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted par. (1) heading, substituted “To ensure” for “To insure”, redesignated former pars. (1) to (6) as subpars. (A) to (F), respectively, of par. (1), realigned margins, and added par. (2).
Subsec. (e).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(3), substituted “subsection (d)(1)(C)” for “subsection (d)(3)”.
Subsec. (f).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(4)(B), inserted “, tribal,” after “State”.
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(4)(A), which directed insertion of “, tribal,” after “State” in heading, was executed editorially but could not be executed in original because heading had been editorially supplied.
Subsec. (g).
Pub. L. 111–211, § 251(b)(5), added subsec. (g).
2006—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 109–162, § 1115(a)(1), inserted after third sentence “The Director shall be responsible for the integrity of data and statistics and shall protect against improper or illegal use or disclosure.”
Subsec. (c)(19).
Pub. L. 109–162, § 1115(a)(2), amended par. (19) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (19) read as follows: “provide for research and improvements in the accuracy, completeness, and inclusiveness of criminal history record information, information systems, arrest warrant, and stolen vehicle record information and information systems and support research concerning the accuracy, completeness, and inclusiveness of other criminal justice record information;”.
Subsec. (d)(6).
Pub. L. 109–162, § 1115(a)(3), added par. (6).
1994—Subsec. (c)(19).
Pub. L. 103–322substituted a semicolon for period at end.
1988—Subsec. (c)(16) to (23).
Pub. L. 100–690added pars. (16) to (19) and redesignated former pars. (16) to (19) as (20) to (23), respectively.
1984—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(1), inserted provision requiring Director to report to Attorney General through Assistant Attorney General.
Subsec. (c)(13).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(2)(A), (C), added par. (13) and struck out former par. (13) relating to provision of financial and technical assistance to States and units of local government relating to collection, analysis, or dissemination of justice statistics.
Subsec. (c)(14), (15).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(2)(C), added pars. (14) and (15). Former pars. (14) and (15) redesignated (16) and (17), respectively.
Subsec. (c)(16).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(2)(A), (B), redesignated par. (14) as (16) and struck out former par. (16) relating to insuring conformance with security and privacy regulations issued under section
3789g of this title.
Subsec. (c)(17).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(2)(B), redesignated par. (15) as (17). Former par. (17) redesignated (19).
Subsec. (c)(18).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(2)(D), added par. (18).
Subsec. (c)(19).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(2)(B), redesignated former par. (17) as (19).
Subsec. (d)(1).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(3)(A), inserted “, and to enter into agreements with such agencies and instrumentalities for purposes of data collection and analysis”.
Subsec. (d)(5).
Pub. L. 98–473, § 605(b)(3)(B)–(D), added par. (5).
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 98–473effective Oct. 12, 1984, see section 609AA(a) of
Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section
3711 of this title.
Construction of 2010 Amendment
Pub. L. 111–211, title II, § 251(c),July 29, 2010,
124 Stat. 2298, provided that: “Nothing in this section [amending this section and provisions set out as a note under section
534 of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure] or any amendment made by this section—
“(1) allows the grant to be made to, or used by, an entity for law enforcement activities that the entity lacks jurisdiction to perform; or
“(2) has any effect other than to authorize, award, or deny a grant of funds to a federally recognized Indian tribe for the purposes described in the relevant grant program.”
[For definition of “Indian tribe” as used in section 251(c) of
Pub. L. 111–211, set out above, see section 203(a) of
Pub. L. 111–211, set out as a note under section
2801 of Title
25, Indians.]
Study of Crimes Against Seniors
Pub. L. 106–534, § 5,Nov. 22, 2000,
114 Stat. 2557, provided that:
“(a) In General.—The Attorney General shall conduct a study relating to crimes against seniors, in order to assist in developing new strategies to prevent and otherwise reduce the incidence of those crimes.
“(b) Issues Addressed.—The study conducted under this section shall include an analysis of—
“(1) the nature and type of crimes perpetrated against seniors, with special focus on—
“(A) the most common types of crimes that affect seniors;
“(B) the nature and extent of telemarketing, sweepstakes, and repair fraud against seniors; and
“(C) the nature and extent of financial and material fraud targeted at seniors;
“(2) the risk factors associated with seniors who have been victimized;
“(3) the manner in which the Federal and State criminal justice systems respond to crimes against seniors;
“(4) the feasibility of States establishing and maintaining a centralized computer database on the incidence of crimes against seniors that will promote the uniform identification and reporting of such crimes;
“(5) the effectiveness of damage awards in court actions and other means by which seniors receive reimbursement and other damages after fraud has been established; and
“(6) other effective ways to prevent or reduce the occurrence of crimes against seniors.”
Inclusion of Seniors in National Crime Victimization Survey
Pub. L. 106–534, § 6,Nov. 22, 2000,
114 Stat. 2557, provided that: “Beginning not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 22, 2000], as part of each National Crime Victimization Survey, the Attorney General shall include statistics relating to—
“(1) crimes targeting or disproportionately affecting seniors;
“(2) crime risk factors for seniors, including the times and locations at which crimes victimizing seniors are most likely to occur; and
“(3) specific characteristics of the victims of crimes who are seniors, including age, gender, race or ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.”
Crime Victims With Disabilities Awareness
Pub. L. 105–301, Oct. 27, 1998,
112 Stat. 2838, as amended by
Pub. L. 106–402, title IV, § 401(b)(10),Oct. 30, 2000,
114 Stat. 1739, provided that:
“SECTION
1. SHORT TITLE.
“This Act may be cited as the ‘Crime Victims With Disabilities Awareness Act’.
“SEC.
2. FINDINGS; PURPOSES.
“(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—
“(1) although research conducted abroad demonstrates that individuals with developmental disabilities are at a 4 to 10 times higher risk of becoming crime victims than those without disabilities, there have been no significant studies on this subject conducted in the United States;
“(2) in fact, the National Crime Victim’s Survey, conducted annually by the Bureau of Justice Statistics of the Department of Justice, does not specifically collect data relating to crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities;
“(3) studies in Canada, Australia, and Great Britain consistently show that victims with developmental disabilities suffer repeated victimization because so few of the crimes against them are reported, and even when they are, there is sometimes a reluctance by police, prosecutors, and judges to rely on the testimony of a disabled individual, making individuals with developmental disabilities a target for criminal predators;
“(4) research in the United States needs to be done to—
“(A) understand the nature and extent of crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities;
“(B) describe the manner in which the justice system responds to crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities; and
“(C) identify programs, policies, or laws that hold promises for making the justice system more responsive to crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities; and
“(5) the National Academy of Science Committee on Law and Justice of the National Research Council is a premier research institution with unique experience in developing seminal, multidisciplinary studies to establish a strong research base from which to make public policy.
“(b) Purposes.—The purposes of this Act are—
“(1) to increase public awareness of the plight of victims of crime who are individuals with developmental disabilities;
“(2) to collect data to measure the extent of the problem of crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities; and
“(3) to develop a basis to find new strategies to address the safety and justice needs of victims of crime who are individuals with developmental disabilities.
“SEC.
3. DEFINITION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY.
“In this Act, the term ‘developmental disability’ has the meaning given the term in section 102 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 [
42 U.S.C.
15002].
“SEC.
4. STUDY.
“(a) In General.—The Attorney General shall conduct a study to increase knowledge and information about crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities that will be useful in developing new strategies to reduce the incidence of crimes against those individuals.
“(b) Issues Addressed.—The study conducted under this section shall address such issues as—
“(1) the nature and extent of crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities;
“(2) the risk factors associated with victimization of individuals with developmental disabilities;
“(3) the manner in which the justice system responds to crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities; and
“(4) the means by which States may establish and maintain a centralized computer database on the incidence of crimes against individuals with disabilities within a State.
“(c) National Academy of Sciences.—In carrying out this section, the Attorney General shall consider contracting with the Committee on Law and Justice of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences to provide research for the study conducted under this section.
“(d) Report.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 27, 1998], the Attorney General shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the study conducted under this section.
“SEC.
5. NATIONAL CRIME VICTIM’S SURVEY.
“Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, as part of each National Crime Victim’s Survey, the Attorney General shall include statistics relating to—
“(1) the nature of crimes against individuals with developmental disabilities; and
“(2) the specific characteristics of the victims of those crimes.”