To increase the efficiency and effectiveness of programs funded under this subchapter, the National Institute of Justice shall—
(1)develop guidelines, in cooperation with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, to assist State and local units of government to conduct program evaluations; and
(2)conduct a reasonable number of comprehensive evaluations of programs funded under section
3755 (formula grants) and section
3762a (discretionary grants) of this title.
(b) Criteria for selecting programs for review
In selecting programs for review, the Director of the National Institute of Justice should consider—
(1)whether the program establishes or demonstrates a new and innovative approach to drug or crime control;
(2)the cost of the program to be evaluated and the number of similar programs funded under section
3755 (formula grants) of this title;
(3)whether the program has a high potential to be replicated in other jurisdictions; and
(4)whether there is substantial public awareness and community involvement in the program. Routine auditing, monitoring, and internal assessment of a State and local drug control program’s progress shall be the sole responsibility of the Bureau of Justice Assistance.
(c) Annual report
The Director of the National Institute of Justice shall annually report to the President, the Attorney General, and the Congress on the nature and findings of the evaluation and research and development activities funded under this section.
To increase the efficiency and effectiveness of programs funded under this subchapter, the National Institute of Justice shall—
(1)develop guidelines, in cooperation with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, to assist State and local units of government to conduct program evaluations; and
(2)conduct a reasonable number of comprehensive evaluations of programs funded under section
3755 (formula grants) and section
3762a (discretionary grants) of this title.
(b) Criteria for selecting programs for review
In selecting programs for review, the Director of the National Institute of Justice should consider—
(1)whether the program establishes or demonstrates a new and innovative approach to drug or crime control;
(2)the cost of the program to be evaluated and the number of similar programs funded under section
3755 (formula grants) of this title;
(3)whether the program has a high potential to be replicated in other jurisdictions; and
(4)whether there is substantial public awareness and community involvement in the program. Routine auditing, monitoring, and internal assessment of a State and local drug control program’s progress shall be the sole responsibility of the Bureau of Justice Assistance.
(c) Annual report
The Director of the National Institute of Justice shall annually report to the President, the Attorney General, and the Congress on the nature and findings of the evaluation and research and development activities funded under this section.
For prior section 520 ofPub. L. 90–351and prior sections
3766 of this title, see note set out preceding section
3750 of this title.
Amendments
2006—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–162, § 1111(c)(2)(B)(i), substituted “program evaluations” for “the program evaluations as required by section
3751(c) of this title”.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–162, § 1111(c)(2)(B)(ii), substituted “evaluations of programs funded under section
3755 (formula grants) and section
3762a (discretionary grants) of this title” for “evaluations of programs funded under section
3756 (formula grants) and sections
3761 and
3762a (discretionary grants) of this title”.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 109–162, § 1111(c)(2)(B)(iii), substituted “programs funded under section
3755 (formula grants)” for “programs funded under section
3756 (formula grants) and section
3761 (discretionary grants)”.
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–162applicable with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after Jan. 5, 2006, and each fiscal year thereafter, see section 1111(d) ofPub. L. 109–162, set out as a note under section
3750 of this title.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Monday, June 17, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
42 USC
Description of Change
Session Year
Public Law
Statutes at Large
This is a list of parts within the Code of Federal Regulations for which this US Code section provides rulemaking authority.
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.