Source
(June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title V, § 502,49 Stat. 1996; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §§ 9–14,52 Stat. 955–957; Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 417, § 6,53 Stat. 1183; July 26, 1956, ch. 737, 70 Stat. 657; Pub. L. 86–518, §§ 1,
2,June 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 86–607, § 1,July 7, 1960, 74 Stat. 362; Pub. L. 87–877, §§ 1,
2(a), (e), (f),Oct. 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 1200, 1201; Pub. L. 88–370, July 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 313; Pub. L. 88–410, § 1,Aug. 10, 1964, 78 Stat. 385; Pub. L. 89–127, Aug. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 519; Pub. L. 89–589, Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 811; Pub. L. 90–572, Oct. 12, 1968, 82 Stat. 1004; Pub. L. 91–40, July 8, 1969, 83 Stat. 44; Pub. L. 91–469, §§ 7,
35(a), (e)–(g), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1019, 1035, 1036; Pub. L. 91–603, § 4(b),Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1675; Pub. L. 93–71, July 10, 1973, 87 Stat. 169; Pub. L. 94–372, §§ 2,
3,July 31, 1976, 90 Stat. 1042; Pub. L. 96–210, Mar. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 100; Pub. L. 96–387, § 3,Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1545; Pub. L. 97–31, § 12(84), (85),Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 161.)
Amendments
1981—Subsecs. (a), (b).
Pub. L. 97–31, § 12(84), substituted “Secretary of Transportation” for “Secretary of Commerce” wherever appearing.
Subsec. (c).
Pub. L. 97–31, § 12(84), (85), substituted “Secretary of Transportation” for “Secretary of Commerce” wherever appearing, and “Secretary of Transportation’s” for “Secretary of Commerce’s”.
Subsecs. (e) to (i).
Pub. L. 97–31, § 12(84), substituted “Secretary of Transportation” for “Secretary of Commerce” wherever appearing.
1980—Subsec. (a).
Pub. L. 96–210struck out “, at any time prior to June 30, 1979,” before “to accept a price for”.
Subsecs. (h), (i).
Pub. L. 96–387added subsecs. (h) and (i).
1976—Subsec. (a).
Pub. L. 94–372, § 2, in third sentence, substituted “at any time prior to June 30, 1979” for “at any time prior to June 30, 1976”, struck out former par. (i) relating to a negotiated price resulting in a construction-differential subsidy equal to or less than 45%, 43%, 41%, 39%, 37% and 35% for fiscal years 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975 and 1976, respectively, and redesignated former pars. (ii), (iii), and (iv) as (1), (2), and (3), respectively.
Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 94–372, § 3, substituted provisions limiting the construction differential to 50% (excluding costs for national defense features), and allowing the Secretary, where such differential is exceeded, to contract with any bidder (notwithstanding section
1155) to reduce the differential to within such percentage for provisions limiting the differential to 55% except for passenger vessels having characteristics set forth in section
1153, which shall be 60%, limiting the differential after June 30, 1970 to 50%, permitting the Secretary to negotiate and contract with any bidder, regardless of section
1155 if in the years 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975 and 1976 a specified percentage is exceeded, prohibiting contracts commencing in 1972, where such differential exceeds such limits unless consideration has been given to the possibility that the commitment to ship construction programs may not be continued under existing limits, and requiring notification to the Commission on American Shipbuilding if the Secretary finds it necessary to enter into such contracts.
1973—Subsec. (a).
Pub. L. 93–71in third sentence, substituted “June 30, 1976” for “June 30, 1973” and limited vessel construction subsidy to 39 per centum in fiscal 1974, 37 per centum in fiscal 1975, and 35 per centum in fiscal 1976.
1970—
Pub. L. 91–469, § 35(a), substituted “Secretary of Commerce” for “Commission”, six times in subsec. (a), four times in subsec. (c), five times in subsec. (e), four times in subsec. (f), and four times in subsec. (g).
Subsec. (a).
Pub. L. 91–603substituted “for the operation and maintenance of” for “to enable it to operate and maintain”.
Pub. L. 91–469, §§ 7(1),
35(e), struck out in first sentence “, on behalf of the applicant,” after “may secure”, substituted in second sentence “proposed ship purchaser, the Secretary of Commerce” for “applicant, the Commission”, inserted conditions precedent to acceptance of negotiated price for ship construction in fiscal years 1971, 1972, and 1973, including availability of shipyard records in connection therewith, substituted in last sentence “for the sale” for “with the applicant for the purchase by him” before “of such vessel”, and authorized sale of vessel upon its completion to the applicant if he is the proposed ship purchaser and if not to another citizen, if the Secretary determines that such citizen possesses the necessary qualifications to enable it to operate and maintain the vessel; and substituted “he” for “it” before “may secure”, respectively.
Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 91–469, § 7(2), provided for recomputation of estimated foreign cost annually, publication of notice to compute or recompute such estimated foreign cost, offer of opportunity to interested persons to file written statements, consideration of relevant matter so filed, explanation of basis of determination, prohibition commencing with fiscal year 1972 of construction contracts requiring construction-differential in excess of prescribed percentages unless there is no likelihood of attaining the percentages and the commitment to the ship construction program may not be continued, notice to Commission on American Shipbuilding of execution of such a contract, and submission of a Commission report on the American shipbuilding industry within six months of the notice, substituted “may equal” for “shall equal”, “construction of that type vessel” for “construction of the proposed vessel”, “exceeds the following percentages: in fiscal year 1971, 45 per centum; in fiscal year 1972, 43 per centum; in fiscal year 1973, 41 per centum; in fiscal year 1974, 39 per centum; in fiscal year 1975, 37 per centum; in fiscal year 1976 and thereafter, 35 per centum” for “in any case exceeds the foregoing applicable percentage of such cost”, and “with such bidder, notwithstanding the provisions of the first sentence of section
1155 of this Appendix with respect to competitive bidding,” for “on behalf of the applicant”, and inserted “with any bidder, whether or not such bidder is the lowest bidder,” after “the Secretary may negotiate” and “, or as close thereto as possible” before “or less”.
Subsec. (c).
Pub. L. 91–469, §§ 7(3),
35(f), inserted “of sale” after introductory phrase “In such contract”, in revising interest rate substituted provision for a rate not less than a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average market yield on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States with remaining periods to maturity comparable to the average maturities of such loans, adjusted to the nearest one-eighth of 1 per centum plus an administrative cost allowance for prior rate of 31/2 per centum per annum, substituted in last sentence “rate per annum applicable to payments that are chargeable to the purchaser’s portion of the price of the vessel” for “rate of 31/2 per centum per annum”, “purchaser” for “applicant” in six places, “purchaser’s portion of the price” for “applicant’s purchase price”, and “purchaser’s” for “applicant’s”; and substituted “Secretary of Commerce’s” for “Commission’s”, respectively.
Subsec. (e).
Pub. L. 91–469, §§ 7(4),
35(g), substituted “a citizen of the United States” for “the applicant” in first sentence and for “an applicant” in third sentence and “his” for “its” in second sentence, respectively.
Subsec. (f).
Pub. L. 91–469, § 7(5), in first par., substituted “this subchapter and subchapter VII of this chapter” for “subchapter VII of this chapter and section
1159 of this Appendix, and the Federal Maritime Board, in connection with ship construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning under this subchapter (except section
1159 of this Appendix),” and “in such manner as he may determine” for “in such manner as it may be determined” in second sentence; and in second par., substituted “purchaser” for “applicant” in six places and “United States port in an essential service” for “United States port on any essential service of the operator” in fourth sentence.
Subsec. (g).
Pub. L. 91–469, § 7(6), substituted “application” and “any citizen of the United States” for “agreement” and “an applicant under this subchapter” in first sentence.
1969—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 91–40substituted “June 30, 1970” for “June 30, 1969”.
1968—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 90–572substituted “June 30, 1969” for “June 30, 1968”.
1966—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 89–589substituted “June 30, 1968” for “June 30, 1966”.
1965—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 89–127substituted “June 30, 1966” for “June 30, 1965”.
1964—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 88–370substituted “June 30, 1965” for “June 30, 1964”.
Subsec. (f).
Pub. L. 88–410provided for reimbursement of expenses incurred during construction and the delivery voyage of a vessel, if as a result of allocation under this subsection, they are in excess of the estimated expenses that would have been incurred if the vessel had been constructed by the lowest responsible bidder, less one-half of any gross income allocable to the delivery voyage, minus one-half the extra expenses incurred to produce such income, and that such reimbursement shall not be part of the construction-differential subsidy, that no interest be paid on any refund authorized, that if the vessel is constructed under section
1159 the price of the vessel is to be reduced by such excess expenses less such gross income, calculated as above, obtained on the delivery voyage, that if the vessel is not to receive the operating-differential subsidy the delivery voyage shall be deemed terminated at the port where the vessel begins loading, and if it does receive the subsidy, when the vessel begins loading at a United States port on any essential service of the operator, but in either case there is to be no compensation greater than the expenses that would have been incurred in delivering the vessel from the shipyard at which it was built to the one of the lowest bidder, that if the allocation results in a saving of expenses for the applicant, the applicant shall pay an equal amount to the Secretary, and if the vessel was built with the subsidy, such payment shall not be considered a reduction of the subsidy.
1962—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 87–877, § 1, among other changes, substituted references to the Secretary, for references to the Federal Maritime Board, wherever appearing, and provided that in the reconstruction or reconditioning of a passenger vessel having the characteristics set forth in section
1153 of this Appendix, the construction differential shall not exceed 60 per centum of the cost, excluding national defense features, however, after June 30, 1964, the construction differential approved by the Secretary for any vessel shall not exceed 50 per centum of such cost.
Subsec. (d).
Pub. L. 87–877, § 2(a), repealed subsec. (d) which provided for giving a preference to Pacific coast bidders in obtaining a subsidy and specified the conditions to be met therefor.
Subsec. (f).
Pub. L. 87–877, § 2(e), (f), substituted “at least once each year” for “periodically”, “existing or impending inadequacy” for “existing inadequacy”, and struck out “, with the approval of the President,” before “allocate such construction”.
1960—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 86–607, § 1(1), increased the limitation on construction differential from 50 to 55 per centum of the construction cost of a vessel and provided for such percentage limitation in lieu of former 331/3 per centum of construction cost, increased to 50 per centum on affirmative vote of two Board members.
Subsec. (c).
Pub. L. 86–518, § 1, substituted “twenty-five” for “twenty” in two places.
Subsec. (d).
Pub. L. 86–607, § 1(2), increased the limitation on construction-differential from 50 to 55 per centum of the construction cost of a vessel.
Subsec. (g).
Pub. L. 86–518, § 2, substituted “at the rate of 4 per centum per annum” for “based on a twenty-year life expectancy”.
1956—Subsec. (f). Act July 26, 1956, substituted provisions that required Secretary of Commerce, with advice of Secretary of the Navy, to make periodic survey of privately owned shipyards to determine adequacy for providing mobilization base, and that any inadequacies would be corrected by Secretary of Commerce or Federal Maritime Board with the approval of the President by allocating work to such yards, for former provisions allowing periodic survey by the Federal Maritime Board of both Navy and privately owned shipyards.
1939—Subsec. (b). Act Aug. 4, 1939, substituted “a foreign shipbuilding center which is deemed by the Commission to furnish a fair and representative example for the determination of the estimated foreign cost of construction of vessels of the type proposed to be constructed” for “a principal foreign shipbuilding center which may reasonably be availed of by the principal foreign competitors in the service in which the vessel is to be operated, and which is deemed by the Commission to furnish a fair and representative example for the determination of the estimated cost of construction in foreign countries of vessels of the type proposed to be constructed”.
1938—Subsec. (a). Act June 23, 1938, § 9, substituted “of the contract price of the vessel” for “the cost of the vessel”.
Subsec. (b). Act June 23, 1938, § 10, permitted negotiations and contracts to build vessels in domestic shipyards in cases where the construction differential exceeds 331/3 per centum or 50 per centum of the cost, and to require a report where there is reason to believe that the bidding is collusive.
Subsec. (c). Act June 23, 1938, § 11, among other changes, substituted “of not less than 25 per centum of the price at which the vessel is sold to the applicant” for “a sum equal to 25 per centum of the construction cost of the vessel paid by the Commission (excluding cost of national-defense features as above provided)”, and required the applicant to pay, not less frequently than annually, interest at the rate of 31/2 per centum per annum on those portions of payments made to the shipbuilder which are chargeable to the applicant’s purchase price of the vessel (after deduction of the applicant’s cash payments).
Subsec. (d). Act June 23, 1938, § 12, substituted “construction-differential subsidy” for “construction subsidy”, and inserted provisions relating to limitation on approval of construction-differential in excess of 50 per centum of the construction cost of the vessel paid by the Commission.
Subsec. (f). Act June 23, 1938, § 13, added subsec. (f).
Subsec. (g). Act June 23, 1938, § 14, added subsec. (g).
Effective Date of 1962 Amendment
Section 5 of
Pub. L. 87–877provided that: “The amendment made by the first section of this Act [amending this section] shall be effective only with respect to contracts entered into with respect to (a) the construction of a vessel the keel of which was laid after June 30, 1959, or (b) the reconstruction or reconditioning of a vessel the shipyard contract for which was entered into after June 30, 1959, and the Secretary may, with the consent of the parties thereto, modify any such contract entered into prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 24, 1962] to the extent authorized by the amendment made by this Act.”
Effective Date of 1960 Amendments
Section 2 of
Pub. L. 86–607, as amended by
Pub. L. 87–222, Sept. 13, 1961,
75 Stat. 494, provided that: “The amendment made by this Act [amending this section] shall be effective only with respect to any contract entered into not later than two years after the date of enactment of this Act [July 7, 1960] under the provisions of section 502 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 [this section], with respect to (a) the construction of a vessel the keel of which was laid, or (b) the reconstruction or reconditioning of a vessel the shipyard contract for which was entered into after June 30, 1959, and the Federal Maritime Board may, with the consent of the parties thereto, modify any such contract entered into prior to the date of enactment of the first amendment to Public Law 86–607 (
74 Stat. 362) [Sept. 13, 1961], to the extent authorized by the amendment made by this Act, as amended.”
Amendment by
Pub. L. 86–518applicable only to vessels delivered by the shipbuilder on or after Jan. 1, 1946, and with respect to such vessels shall become effective on Jan. 1, 1960, and with respect to vessels delivered by the shipbuilder before Jan. 1, 1946, the provisions of this chapter existing immediately before June 12, 1960, shall continue in effect, see section 8(a) of
Pub. L. 86–518, set out as a note under section
1125 of this Appendix.
Modification of Contracts; Conditions
Section 2 of
Pub. L. 88–410provided that: “The amendment made by this Act [amending this section] shall be effective with respect to any contract entered into under the provisions of section 502 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended [this section], and the Secretary of Commerce shall, with the consent of the other parties thereto, modify any such contract entered into prior to the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 10, 1964] to the extent authorized by the amendment made by this Act, except that the Secretary shall not agree to any such modification which would result in a payment by the United States unless, within one year after enactment of this Act, application is made for such modification. No payment shall be made by the Secretary under the provisions of the amendment made by this Act with respect to any contract entered into after the date of enactment of this Act unless the recipient of such payment has agreed to the modification of any contract which was entered into prior to the date of enactment of this Act and to which such recipient was a party, and which, if modified under the authority of this section, would result in a payment to the United States.”
Contracts for New Ship Construction Awarded on Bids Opened Prior to October 24, 1962
Section 2(a) of
Pub. L. 87–877provided in part: “That the repeal of subsection (d) ofsection
502 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 [subsec. (d) of this section], shall not be effective with respect to contracts for new ship construction under title V of said Act [this subchapter] awarded on the basis of bids opened prior to the date of the enactment of this Act. [Oct. 24, 1962].”
Rate of Depreciation for Vessels Delivered by Shipbuilder on or After January 1, 1946, and Before January 1, 1960
For provisions relating to computation of depreciation with respect to vessels delivered by the shipbuilder on or after Jan. 1, 1946, and before Jan. 1, 1960, see section 8(b) of
Pub. L. 86–518, set out as a note under section
1125 of this Appendix.
Revision of Contracts, Commitments To Insure Mortgages, Mortgages, and Mortgage Insurance Contracts Entered Into Prior to June 12, 1960
For provisions authorizing revision, see section 8(c) of
Pub. L. 86–518, set out as a note under section
1125 of this Appendix.
Commercial Expectancy or Period of Depreciation of Tankers and Other Liquid Bulk Carriers
Nothing in any amendment made by
Pub. L. 86–518to operate or be interpreted to change from 20 to 25 years the provisions of this chapter relating to the commercial expectancy or period of depreciation of any tanker or other liquid bulk carrier, see section 9 of
Pub. L. 86–518, set out as a note under section
1125 of this Appendix.
Construction and Sale of Superliner Passenger Vessels
Pub. L. 85–521, July 15, 1958,
72 Stat. 359, provided: “That it is necessary, in order to carry out the merchant marine policy declared in the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended [this chapter], to have (a) a superliner passenger vessel equivalent to the steamship United States, to replace the steamship America for operation on an essential trade route in the North Atlantic, and (b) a superliner passenger vessel with capacity of approximately one thousand four hundred passengers for operation on an essential trade route in the Pacific Ocean. Nothing herein shall preclude the operation of either of these vessels in other areas, subject to the approval of the Federal Maritime Board. There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Commerce such sums as may be necessary, to remain available until expended, for the construction, outfitting, and equipping of such vessels.
“Sec. 2. Concurrently with entering into contracts with shipbuilders for the construction of said vessels, the Board is authorized to enter into contracts for the sale of the vessels, fully outfitted and equipped, upon their completion, (a) with respect to the superliner passenger vessel equivalent to the steamship United States, to the United States Lines Company, for the fixed price of $47,000,000, and (b) with respect to the superliner passenger vessel for operation in the Pacific Ocean, to the American President Lines, Limited, for the fixed price of $34,000,000, or 45 per centum of the domestic construction cost of the vessel fully outfitted and equipped (excluding national defense features and escalation) whichever is the greater. The sales prices stated herein shall include the cost of stabilizers, all outfit and equipment not covered by the shipbuilders’ bids, customary architects’ and interior decorators’ fees for design, inspection during construction, and all escalation provided for in the shipbuilders’ bids: Provided, however, That such prices shall be increased in an amount equal to 45 per centum of any net change in the cost of the vessels (other than national defense features) arising out of any changes in the bid specifications approved by the Federal Maritime Board or any changes in the usual outfitting and equipping of the vessels if such changes are requested by the purchasers and approved by the Federal Maritime Board after the enactment hereof. Terms and conditions of payment of the purchase price shall be as provided for in sections 502(c) and 503 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended [sections
1152
(c) and
1153 of this Appendix]. In order that such construction of the superliner passenger vessel equivalent to the steamship United States may be accomplished promptly, the Federal Maritime Board, in its discretion, may have such a vessel constructed, without further bidding, under outstanding bids which have hitherto been made by United States shipbuilders on a similar vessel.
“Sec. 3. Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the construction and sale of the superliner passenger vessels authorized by this Act shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended [this chapter].
“Sec. 4. For the purposes of this Act the words ‘construction differential subsidy’ used in the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended [this chapter], shall mean the difference between the sales price paid by the purchaser hereunder and the cost of the vessel (less national defense features) including the cost of stabilizers, all outfit and equipment not covered by the shipbuilders’ bids, customary architects’ and interior decorators’ fees for design, inspection during construction, and all escalation provided for in the shipbuilders’ bids.
“Sec. 5. Any contract for an operating differential subsidy on the operation of a vessel constructed and sold under this Act shall be subject to the provisions of title VI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended [subchapter VI of this chapter]: Provided, however, That such contract shall provide that, if at the end of any recapture period, the net profits on the operation of such vessel for such recapture period, computed without regard to profits or losses on other vessels operated by the contractor, exceed 10 per centum per annum on a cumulative basis upon the contractor’s capital necessarily employed in the operation of such vessel, as determined by the Federal Maritime Board, the contractor shall account to the United States for an amount equal to 75 per centum of such excess profits.”