49 USC § 24709 - International transportation
Amtrak may develop and operate international intercity rail passenger transportation between the United States and Canada and between the United States and Mexico. The Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General, in cooperation with Amtrak, shall maintain, consistent with the effective enforcement of the immigration and customs laws, en route customs inspection and immigration procedures for international intercity rail passenger transportation that will—
Amtrak may develop and operate international intercity rail passenger transportation between the United States and Canada and between the United States and Mexico. The Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General, in cooperation with Amtrak, shall maintain, consistent with the effective enforcement of the immigration and customs laws, en route customs inspection and immigration procedures for international intercity rail passenger transportation that will—
Source
(Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e),July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 929.)
| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
|---|---|---|
| 24709 | ||
| 45:545(e)(7) (less words between parentheses). | ||
| Oct. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–518, 84 Stat. 1327, § 305(e)(7) (less words between parentheses); added Nov. 3, 1973, Pub. L. 93–146, § 6, 87 Stat. 551. | ||
| 45:545(i). | ||
| Oct. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–518, 84 Stat. 1327, § 305(i); added Oct. 28, 1974, Pub. L. 93–496, § 4, 88 Stat. 1527; restated May 26, 1975, Pub. L. 94–25, § 3, 89 Stat. 90; Sept. 29, 1979, Pub. L. 96–73, § 106, 93 Stat. 539; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, § 1176, 95 Stat. 692; Apr. 7, 1986, Pub. L. 99–272, § 13031(h)(1), 100 Stat. 310. |
In this section, before clause (1), the words “points within”, “points in”, and “including Montreal, Canada; Vancouver, Canada; and Nuevo Laredo, Mexico” in 45:545(e)(7) are omitted as surplus. The words “establish and” in 45:545(i) (1st sentence) are omitted as executed. The words “trains operated in” are omitted as surplus.
Cross-Border Passenger Rail Service
Pub. L. 110–432, div. B, title IV, § 406,Oct. 16, 2008, 122 Stat. 4958, provided that:
“(a) Plan.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 16, 2008], Amtrak shall, in consultation with the Secretary [of Transportation], the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Washington State Department of Transportation, and the owners of the relevant railroad infrastructure—
“(1) develop a strategic plan to facilitate expanded passenger rail service across the international border between the United States and Canada during the 2010 Olympic Games on the Amtrak passenger rail route between Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and Eugene, Oregon (commonly known as ‘Amtrak Cascades’);
“(2) develop recommendations for the Department of Homeland Security to process efficiently rail passengers traveling on Amtrak Cascades across such international border during the 2010 Olympic Games; and
“(3) submit to Congress a report containing the strategic plan described in paragraph (1) and the recommendations described in paragraph (2).
“(b) Travel Facilitation.—Using existing authority or agreements, or upon reaching additional agreements with Canada, the Secretary [of Transportation] and other Federal agencies, as appropriate, are authorized to establish facilities and procedures to conduct preclearance of passengers traveling on Amtrak trains from Canada to the United States. The Secretary shall seek to establish such facilities and procedures—
“(1) in Vancouver, Canada, no later than June 1, 2009; and
“(2) in other areas as determined appropriate by the Secretary.”
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Friday, May 3, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 49 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.