Before proceeding beyond phase 6.2 activities with respect to any lifetime extension program, the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such phase 6.2 activities, including—
(1)an assessment of the lifetime extension options considered for the phase 6.2 activities, including whether the subsystems and components in each option are considered to be a refurbishment, reuse, or replacement of such subsystem or component; and
(2)an assessment of the option selected for the phase 6.2 activities, including—
(A)whether the subsystems and components will be refurbished, reused, or replaced; and
(B)the advantages and disadvantages of refurbishment, reuse, and replacement for each such subsystem and component.
(b) Phase 6.2 activities defined
In this section, the term “phase 6.2 activities” means, with respect to a lifetime extension program, the phase 6.2 feasibility study and option down-select.
2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–66struck out “established by section
179 of title
10” after “Nuclear Weapons Council” in introductory provisions.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday, August 13, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.