6 USC § 942 - Post-incident resumption of trade
(a)
In general
The Secretary shall develop and update, as necessary, protocols for the resumption of trade in accordance with section
941
(b)(10) of this title in the event of a transportation disruption or a transportation security incident. The protocols shall include—
(1)
the identification of the appropriate initial incident commander, if the Commandant of the Coast Guard is not the appropriate person, and lead departments, agencies, or offices to execute such protocols;
(b)
Vessels
In determining the prioritization of vessels accessing facilities (as defined under section
70101 of title
46), the Commandant of the Coast Guard may, to the extent practicable and consistent with the protocols and plans required under this section to ensure the safe and secure transit of vessels to ports in the United States after a transportation security incident, give priority to a vessel—
(c)
Cargo
In determining the prioritization of the resumption of the flow of cargo and consistent with the protocols established under this section, the Commissioner may give preference to cargo—
(1)
entering a port of entry directly from a foreign seaport designated under the Container Security Initiative;
(2)
from the supply chain of a validated C–TPAT participant and other private sector entities, as appropriate; or
(d)
Coordination
The Secretary shall ensure that there is appropriate coordination among the Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Commissioner, and other Federal officials following a maritime disruption or maritime transportation security incident in order to provide for the resumption of trade.
(e)
Communication
Consistent with section
941 of this title, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, Commissioner, and other appropriate Federal officials, shall promptly communicate any revised procedures or instructions intended for the private sector following a maritime disruption or maritime transportation security incident.
(a)
In general
The Secretary shall develop and update, as necessary, protocols for the resumption of trade in accordance with section
941
(b)(10) of this title in the event of a transportation disruption or a transportation security incident. The protocols shall include—
(1)
the identification of the appropriate initial incident commander, if the Commandant of the Coast Guard is not the appropriate person, and lead departments, agencies, or offices to execute such protocols;
(b)
Vessels
In determining the prioritization of vessels accessing facilities (as defined under section
70101 of title
46), the Commandant of the Coast Guard may, to the extent practicable and consistent with the protocols and plans required under this section to ensure the safe and secure transit of vessels to ports in the United States after a transportation security incident, give priority to a vessel—
(c)
Cargo
In determining the prioritization of the resumption of the flow of cargo and consistent with the protocols established under this section, the Commissioner may give preference to cargo—
(1)
entering a port of entry directly from a foreign seaport designated under the Container Security Initiative;
(2)
from the supply chain of a validated C–TPAT participant and other private sector entities, as appropriate; or
(d)
Coordination
The Secretary shall ensure that there is appropriate coordination among the Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Commissioner, and other Federal officials following a maritime disruption or maritime transportation security incident in order to provide for the resumption of trade.
(e)
Communication
Consistent with section
941 of this title, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, Commissioner, and other appropriate Federal officials, shall promptly communicate any revised procedures or instructions intended for the private sector following a maritime disruption or maritime transportation security incident.
Source
(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, § 202,Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1903.)
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Friday, May 3, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 6 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.