6 USC § 982 - Screening and scanning of cargo containers
(a)
One hundred percent screening of cargo containers and 100 percent scanning of high-risk containers
(b)
Full-scale implementation
(1)
In general
A container that was loaded on a vessel in a foreign port shall not enter the United States (either directly or via a foreign port) unless the container was scanned by nonintrusive imaging equipment and radiation detection equipment at a foreign port before it was loaded on a vessel.
(2)
Application
Paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to containers loaded on a vessel in a foreign country on or after the earlier of—
(4)
Extensions
The Secretary may extend the date specified in paragraph (2)(A) or (2)(B) for 2 years, and may renew the extension in additional 2-year increments, for containers loaded in a port or ports, if the Secretary certifies to Congress that at least two of the following conditions exist:
(A)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) are not available for purchase and installation.
(B)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) do not have a sufficiently low false alarm rate for use in the supply chain.
(C)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) cannot be purchased, deployed, or operated at ports overseas, including, if applicable, because a port does not have the physical characteristics to install such a system.
(D)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) cannot be integrated, as necessary, with existing systems.
(6)
Report on extensions
An extension under paragraph (4) for a port or ports shall take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the date the Secretary provides a report to Congress that—
(7)
Report on renewal of extension
If an extension under paragraph (4) takes effect, the Secretary shall, after one year, submit a report to Congress on whether the Secretary expects to seek to renew the extension.
(8)
Scanning technology standards
In implementing paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(9)
International trade and other obligations
In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall consult with appropriate Federal departments and agencies and private sector stakeholders, and ensure that actions under this section do not violate international trade obligations, and are consistent with the World Customs Organization framework, or other international obligations of the United States.
(c)
Report
Not later than 6 months after the submission of a report under section
981
(d) of this title, and every 6 months thereafter, the Secretary shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing the status of full-scale deployment under subsection (b) and the cost of deploying the system at each foreign port at which the integrated scanning systems are deployed.
[1] So in original. Probably should be “paragraph (2)(B)”.
(a)
One hundred percent screening of cargo containers and 100 percent scanning of high-risk containers
(b)
Full-scale implementation
(1)
In general
A container that was loaded on a vessel in a foreign port shall not enter the United States (either directly or via a foreign port) unless the container was scanned by nonintrusive imaging equipment and radiation detection equipment at a foreign port before it was loaded on a vessel.
(2)
Application
Paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to containers loaded on a vessel in a foreign country on or after the earlier of—
(4)
Extensions
The Secretary may extend the date specified in paragraph (2)(A) or (2)(B) for 2 years, and may renew the extension in additional 2-year increments, for containers loaded in a port or ports, if the Secretary certifies to Congress that at least two of the following conditions exist:
(A)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) are not available for purchase and installation.
(B)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) do not have a sufficiently low false alarm rate for use in the supply chain.
(C)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) cannot be purchased, deployed, or operated at ports overseas, including, if applicable, because a port does not have the physical characteristics to install such a system.
(D)
Systems to scan containers in accordance with paragraph (1) cannot be integrated, as necessary, with existing systems.
(6)
Report on extensions
An extension under paragraph (4) for a port or ports shall take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the date the Secretary provides a report to Congress that—
(7)
Report on renewal of extension
If an extension under paragraph (4) takes effect, the Secretary shall, after one year, submit a report to Congress on whether the Secretary expects to seek to renew the extension.
(8)
Scanning technology standards
In implementing paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(9)
International trade and other obligations
In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall consult with appropriate Federal departments and agencies and private sector stakeholders, and ensure that actions under this section do not violate international trade obligations, and are consistent with the World Customs Organization framework, or other international obligations of the United States.
(c)
Report
Not later than 6 months after the submission of a report under section
981
(d) of this title, and every 6 months thereafter, the Secretary shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing the status of full-scale deployment under subsection (b) and the cost of deploying the system at each foreign port at which the integrated scanning systems are deployed.
[1] So in original. Probably should be “paragraph (2)(B)”.
Source
(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, § 232,Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1916; Pub. L. 110–53, title XVII, § 1701(a),Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 489.)
References in Text
The Homeland Security Act of 2002, referred to in subsec. (b)(8)(B), is Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, which is classified principally to chapter 1 (§ 101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
101 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
2007—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–53reenacted heading without change and amended text of subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, text related to full deployment of an integrated scanning system after the Secretary had determined that such system had met section
981
(c) requirements, had a sufficiently low false alarm rate, was capable of being deployed overseas, was capable of integrating with existing systems, would not significantly impact trade flow, and had provided for automated notification of high-risk cargo.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday, May 21, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 6 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.