(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, § 202,60 Stat. 1087.)
References in Text
Under this chapter, referred to in text, was in the original “hereunder”, and was translated as meaning under title II of act Aug. 14, 1946, which is classified generally to this chapter.
Short Title of 2010 Amendment
Pub. L. 111–239
, § 1,Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2501
, provided that: “This Act [enacting section
of this title, amending sections
of this title, enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
of this title, and amending provisions set out as a note under section
of this title] may be cited as the ‘Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010’.”
Short Title of 2000 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–532
, § 1,Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2541
, provided that: “This Act [enacting subchapter III of this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Dairy Market Enhancement Act of 2000’.”
Section 201 of title II of act Aug. 14, 1946, provided that: “This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946’.”
Transfer of Functions
Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, § 1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18
, 67 Stat. 633
, set out as a note under section
of this title.
Specialty Crops Competitiveness
Pub. L. 108–465
2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
, §§ 2,
, title I, § 101,Dec. 21, 2004, 118 Stat. 3882
, 3883, as amended by Pub. L. 110–234
, title X, § 10109,May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1338
; Pub. L. 110–246
, § 4(a), title X, § 10109,June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664
, 2100, provided that:
“(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
“(1) A secure domestic food supply is a national security imperative for the United States.
“(2) A competitive specialty crop industry in the United States is necessary for the production of an abundant, affordable supply of highly nutritious fruits, vegetables, and other specialty crops, which are vital to the health and well-being of all Americans.
“(3) Increased consumption of specialty crops will provide tremendous health and economic benefits to both consumers and specialty crop growers.
“(4) Specialty crop growers believe that there are numerous areas of Federal agriculture policy that could be improved to promote increased consumption of specialty crops and increase the competitiveness of producers in the efficient production of affordable specialty crops in the United States.
“(5) As the globalization of markets continues, it is becoming increasingly difficult for United States producers to compete against heavily subsidized foreign producers in both the domestic and foreign markets.
“(6) United States specialty crop producers also continue to face serious tariff and non-tariff trade barriers in many export markets.
“(b) Purpose.—It is the purpose of this Act [see Short Title of 2004 Amendment note set out under section
of this title] to make necessary changes in Federal agriculture policy to accomplish the goals of increasing fruit, vegetable, and nut consumption and improving the competitiveness of United States specialty crop producers.
“In this Act:
“(1) The term ‘specialty crop’ means fruits and vegetables, tree nuts, dried fruits, and horticulture and nursery crops (including floriculture).
“(2) The term ‘State’ means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
“(3) The term ‘State department of agriculture’ means the agency, commission, or department of a State government responsible for agriculture within the State.
“TITLE I—STATE ASSISTANCE FOR SPECIALTY CROPS
101. SPECIALTY CROP BLOCK GRANTS.
“(a) Availability and Purpose of Grants.—Using the funds made available under subsection (j), the Secretary of Agriculture shall make grants to States for each of the fiscal years 2005 through 2012 to be used by State departments of agriculture solely to enhance the competitiveness of specialty crops.
“(b) Grants Based on Value of Production.—Subject to subsection (c), the amount of the grant for a fiscal year to a State under this section shall bear the same ratio to the total amount made available under subsection (j) for that fiscal year as the value of specialty crop production in the State during the preceding calendar year bears to the value of specialty crop production during the preceding calendar year in all States whose application for a grant for that fiscal year is accepted by the Secretary under subsection (f).
“(c) Minimum Grant Amount.—Notwithstanding subsection (b), each State shall receive a grant under this section for each fiscal year in an amount that is at least equal to the higher of—
“(1) $100,000; or
“(2) 1/3 of 1 percent of the total amount of funding made available to carry out this section for the fiscal year.
“(d) Eligibility.—To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a State department of agriculture shall prepare and submit, for approval by the Secretary of Agriculture, an application at such time, in such a manner, and containing such information as the Secretary shall require by regulation, including—
“(1) a State plan that meets the requirements of subsection (e);
“(2) an assurance that the State will comply with the requirements of the plan; and
“(3) an assurance that grant funds received under this section shall supplement the expenditure of State funds in support of specialty crops grown in that State, rather than replace State funds.
“(e) Plan Requirements.—The State plan shall identify the lead agency charged with the responsibility of carrying out the plan and indicate how the grant funds will be utilized to enhance the competitiveness of specialty crops.
“(f) Review of Application.—In reviewing the application of a State submitted under subsection (d), the Secretary of Agriculture shall ensure that the State plan would carry out the purpose of grant program, as specified in subsection (a). The Secretary may accept or reject applications for a grant under this section.
“(g) Effect of Noncompliance.—If the Secretary of Agriculture, after reasonable notice to a State, finds that there has been a failure by the State to comply substantially with any provision or requirement of the State plan, the Secretary may disqualify, for one or more years, the State from receipt of future grants under this section.
“(h) Audit Requirements.—For each year that a State receives a grant under this section, the State shall conduct an audit of the expenditures of grant funds by the State. Not later than 30 days after the completion of the audit, the State shall submit a copy of the audit to the Secretary of Agriculture.
“(1) In general.—The Secretary shall reallocate to other States in accordance with paragraph (2) any amounts made available for a fiscal year under this section that are not obligated or expended by a date during that fiscal year determined by the Secretary.
“(2) Pro rata allocation.—The Secretary shall allocate funds described in paragraph (1) pro rata to the remaining States that applied during the specified grant application period.
“(3) Use of reallocated funds.—Funds allocated to a State under this subsection shall be used by the State only to carry out projects that were previously approved in the State plan of the State.
“(j) Funding.—Of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary of Agriculture shall make grants under this section, using—
“(1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
“(2) $49,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; and
“(3) $55,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2012.”
National Commission on Food Marketing
Pub. L. 88–354
, July 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 269
, as amended by Pub. L. 89–20
, May 15, 1965, 79 Stat. 111
, provided for the establishment of a bipartisan National Commission on Food Marketing composed of fifteen members, five from the Senate, five from the House of Representatives and five from outside the Federal Government, to study and appraise the marketing structure of the food industry and to make a final report of its findings and conclusions to the President and to the Congress by July 1, 1966. The Commission ceased to exist ninety days after submission of its final report.