Skip to main content

Rational Basis

  Rational basis review is a test used in some contexts to determine a law's constitutionality. To pass rational basis review, the challenged law must be rationally related to a legitimate government interest. Rational basis is the most lenient form of judicial review, as both strict scrutiny and intermediate scrutiny are considered more stringent. Rational basis review is generally used when in cases where no fundamental rights or suspect classifications are at issue.  

Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary

Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.

August 19, 2010, 5:23 pm

 

 

 

In Romer v. Evans (1996), the Court invalidated Amendment 2, a provision of the Colorado state Constitution which proscribed the granting of “protected” status based on homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation, on grounds that it violated the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment.  The Court applied traditional rational basis scrutiny and found that, “if a law neither burdens a fundamental right nor targets a suspect class, we will uphold the legislative classification so long as it bears a rational relation to some legitimate end.  Amendment 2 fails, indeed defies, even this conventional inquiry.”