pattern of noncompliance
(19) Pattern of noncompliance (A) In general The term “pattern of noncompliance” means the persistent failure— (i) of a Convention country to implement and abide by provisions of the Hague Abduction Convention; (ii) of a non-Convention country to abide by bilateral procedures that have been established between the United States and such country; or (iii) of a non-Convention country to work with the Central Authority of the United States to resolve abduction cases. (B) Persistent failure Persistent failure under subparagraph (A) may be evidenced in a given country by the presence of 1 or more of the following criteria: (i) Thirty percent or more of the total abduction cases in such country are unresolved abduction cases. (ii) The Central Authority regularly fails to fulfill its responsibilities pursuant to— (I) the Hague Abduction Convention; or (II) any bilateral procedures between the United States and such country. (iii) The judicial or administrative branch, as applicable, of the national government of a Convention country or a bilateral procedures country fails to regularly implement and comply with the provisions of the Hague Abduction Convention or bilateral procedures, as applicable. (iv) Law enforcement authorities regularly fail to enforce return orders or determinations of rights of access rendered by the judicial or administrative authorities of the government of the country in abduction cases.