Skip to main content

обов'язок захищати

Закон України "Про Уповноваженого Верховної Ради України з прав людини", Верховна Рада України (Law of Ukraine On the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights)

Parliamentary control over the observance of human rights and freedoms, including gender equality, is implemented by the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights as enshrined in the Law of Ukraine "On the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights." The purpose of the Commissioner’s parliamentary control is to prevent discrimination in exercising human rights and freedoms. When applying to the Commissioner, there are no privileges or restrictions based on gender, race, color, religion, or other grounds.

Кримінальний процесуальний кодекс України, Верховна Рада України, 2013 (Угода про примирення: статті 469, 474) (Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, Reconciliation Agreement: Arts. 469, 474)

A “reconciliation agreement” is designed to save all participants time and stress. Courts can often take years to finalize a matter, but a reconciliation agreement allows for a single hearing to complete the case, including a sentence for the perpetrator and compensation for the victim. In criminal proceedings related to domestic violence, an offender often has personal influence on the victim (e.g., cohabitation or family relations). Therefore, there are special rules for concluding a reconciliation agreement.

Кримінальний процесуальний кодекс України, Верховна Рада України, 2013 (частина 6 статті 194) (Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, Art. 194(6))

Domestic violence is a specific crime committed in the family or within the place of residence or between relatives, between former or current spouses, or between other persons who lived together as a family but were not related or married to each other, regardless of whether the perpetrator of domestic violence lived in the same place as the victim, as well as threats of such acts (also see the

Справа № 531/352/22

The plaintiff turned to court for a restraining order against the defendant, her husband, to keep him away from their joint place of residence and remove obstacles to her using the car that was purchased during their marriage and belonged to the plaintiff. She argued that, although they were officially married, the marital relationship between them had effectively ended. The husband constantly resorted to economic and physical violence against her, taking away funds and preventing her from earning money for her living expenses and treatment on her own.

Subscribe to обов'язок захищати