Skip to main content

妊娠中絶とリプロダクティブ・ヘルス・ライツ

平成16年(受)1748 (2004 (Ju) No. 1748)

The Supreme Court was asked to rule whether a father-child relationship could be legally recognized in the case where a child’s mother became pregnant through in-vitro fertilization with the frozen sperm of a deceased husband who, while he was alive, had consented to the use of the sperm even after his death.  The Supreme Court reversed the High Court’s ruling and declined to recognize the father-child relationship.  The Supreme Court considered that the legal framework in Japan concerning parent-child relationships did not anticipate such a relationship between a father and his c

Subscribe to 妊娠中絶とリプロダクティブ・ヘルス・ライツ