Skip to main content

inter-american commission on human rights

ID
628

Ana, Beatriz, and Celia González Pérez v. Mexico

Sexual Violence and Rape, Torture, Indigenous Populations, Failure of State Responsibility. The Mexican military illegally detained, raped, and tortured the Tzeltal native sisters Ana, Beatriz, and Celia González Pérez. The Mexican State argued that the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) did not have competence to review the petition because the sisters did not exhaust their domestic remedies.

Caso 12.046 Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Informe Nº 33/02 (Chile, 2002)

Case 12.046 arose when a pregnant teenager was expelled from her school on account of her pregnancy, an act deemed discriminatory. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) examined the petition and issued Report No. 33/02, finding that the expulsion violated the girl’s fundamental rights, including the right to education and equality. Chile reached a friendly settlement agreement, committing to cover the teenager’s educational expenses and to ensure that similar acts of discrimination would not recur within the school system.

 

Lenahan (Gonzales) et al v. United States, Case 12.626, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Report No. 80/11 (2011)

Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) petitioned the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights indicating that her due process rights were violated when her repeated and urgent calls to police reporting her three daughters missing, were ignored; despite her having a restraining order against their father/her estranged husband. Previously, in Castle Rock v.

Maria Merciadri de Morini v. Argentina

Maria Merciadri de Morini v. Argentina, Argentina, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, 2001. Gender Discrimination, Political Rights, Equal Protection, Due Process. Ms. Maria Merciadri de Morini’s political party produced an election ballot that violated Argentine law. The law required election ballots to include 30% of women candidates. Ms. Merciadri de Morini’s political party only placed one woman out of five candidates where, by law, there should have been at least two women on the ballot. Ms.

X and Relatives v. Colombia

Rape by military members. Case was brought before the Commission against Colombia for failing to prosecute members of the Colombian military for sexually assaulting the victim. The Complaint sought to have Colombia assume international responsibility for violating articles 1(1), 5, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 22 of the American Convention on Human Rights, as well as Articles I, V, VII, XI, XVIII and XXVI of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. Colombia and the petitioners were able to reach a friendly settlement under which the victim was awarded moral and material damages.

X and Y v. Argentina

Vaginal inspections for visits to family inmates.  A complaint was brought against Argentina by a woman and her 13-year old daughter who were routinely subjected to vaginal inspections when they would visit the woman's husband (and girl's father) at a prison.

Zoilamérica Narváez Murillo v. Nicaragua

Ms. Zoilamérica Narváez Murillo suffered physical (sexual abuse, rape, and sexual harassment) and psychological violence by her adoptive father, Mr. Daniel Ortega Saavedra. Mr. Ortega was a deputy in Nicaragua’s National Assembly and protected by congressional immunity from charges against him. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) held in 2001 that it had competence to review Ms. Murillo’s petition. The IACHR withheld on deciding the case on the merits in hopes that the parties would amicably come to a settlement. On June 9, 2009, Ms.

Subscribe to inter-american commission on human rights