Skip to main content

well-founded fear

ID
1238

Appellant S395/2002 v. Minister of Immigration and Citizenship

The appellants, both homosexual male citizens of Bangladesh, arrived in Australia and applied for protection visas. To be recognized as refugees, the appellants had to show that they had a well-founded fear of being persecuted due to their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The appellants argued that they belonged to a “particular social group” that was subject to discrimination and harm in Bangladesh by virtue of their homosexuality.

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v. SZMDS

The respondent, an allegedly homosexual citizen of Pakistan, arrived in Australia on a visitor visa in 2007 and applied for a protection visa. To be recognized as a refugee, the respondent had to show that he had a well-founded fear of being persecuted due to his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion. The respondent argued that, as a homosexual man, he belonged to a particular social group that was persecuted and subject to harm in Pakistan.

Thomas v. Morris, 224 W. Va. 661 (2009)

In 2007, Thomas (petitioner) and Morris (defendant) ended their twelve-year relationship. One year later, Morris began to make efforts to renew the relationship, and started harassing Thomas with numerous phone calls, leaving voicemail messages on her home and work phone, and making unannounced visits to her workplace and home. In June of 2008, Morris arrived at her residence and did not leave the premises for approximately two hours. During that time, he banged a three-foot metal bar against her trailer, and she felt trapped in her home. Thomas was aware that Morris rou

Subscribe to well-founded fear