Skip to main content

United States

ID
70
Level
Country
ParentID
1007

Alaska Statutes §§ 13.52.050–.060 Health Care Decisions

Under Alaska Statutes §§ 13.52.050–.060, the state restricts certain health care decisions by agents or surrogates and imposes obligations on providers and institutions. Section 13.52.050 prohibits an agent or surrogate from consenting to procedures classified as exceptional, such as abortion, sterilization, or psychosurgery, except when the patient’s own express instruction permits.

Alaska Statutes §§ 14.30.360–.361 Health and Sexual Education in Public Schools

Alaska Statutes §§ 14.30.360 and 14.30.361 jointly establish the framework for health, personal safety, and reproductive education in the state’s public schools. Section 14.30.360 encourages school districts to offer health education from kindergarten through grade twelve. This education may include instruction in personal safety, with specific attention to the identification and prevention of child abuse, abduction, neglect, sexual abuse, and domestic violence.

Alaska Statutes § 14.18.010 et seq. Prohibition Against Discrimination Based on Sex or Race in Public Education

Section 14.18.010 et seq. prohibits discrimination in Alaska’s public education system on the basis of sex or race, applying to both students and employees. It bars discriminatory practices in employment, counseling and guidance services, athletic and recreational programs, course offerings, textbooks, and instructional materials. The law is grounded in the Alaska Constitution’s guarantee of equal educational opportunity, and mandates that all programs and opportunities be available without regard to sex.

Alaska Statutes § 14.30.356 Teen Dating Violence and Abuse Education

Under Alaska Stat. § 14.30.356 the state, in consultation with school districts, must develop and approve a program targeting teen dating violence and abuse awareness and prevention for grades 7 through 12. The program must include training for employees and students, notices to parents, and periodic review by a qualified individual or committee to ensure alignment with accepted standards.

Aleem v. Aleem

Court held that divorce obtained by husband under Islamic religious and secular Pakistani law would not be recognized and afforded comity in Maryland.  Petitioner argued that because he performed “talaq,” (which under Islamic law, allows a husband to divorce his wife by stating “I divorce thee” three times) the Circuit Court for Montgomery County lacked jurisdiction “to litigate the division of the parties’ marital property.”  “The trial court found that the marriage contract entered into on the day of the parties’ marriage in Pakistan specifically did not provide for the division

Allegheny County v. Wilcox

The defendant-appellant, the Court of Common Pleas, appealed a ruling by the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (“PHRC”).  The PHRC had ruled that the defendant discriminated against female secretaries with respect to compensation and directed them to upgrade the secretaries’ wages and to pay them back pay.  The defendant argued that the PHRC could not require it to increase the wages and also that it was not considered an “employer” under 43 P.S.

Allen v. Totes Isotoner Corp.

The plaintiff-appellant, an employee of Totes/Isotoner Corporation, had for two weeks taken breaks without her employer’s knowledge to lactate. After the defendant fired her “for her failure to follow directions,” the plaintiff filed suit alleging wrongful termination on the basis of her pregnancy. The Butler County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment in favor of her employer, and the Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed.

Subscribe to United States