State v. Urena

The defendant appealed a conviction of manslaughter after stabbing her boyfriend to death, arguing that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she did not act in self-defense based on evidence that she suffered from battered women’s syndrome. The Supreme Court of Rhode Island clarified the burden of proof in establishing battered women’s syndrome as a defense, stating that the “defendant [is] required to prove the existence of [battered women’s syndrome] as an affirmative defense by a fair preponderance of the evidence.” Accordingly, the lower court correctly instructed the jury that the burden of proof was on the defendant, not the state, to show that she was suffering from the effects of battered women’s syndrome, and the conviction at the lower court was upheld.

Topics

• Domestic and intimate partner violence

Geographical location

• North America
• United States
• Rhode Island

Keywords

• criminal law and procedure
• murder

Year

• 2006

External URL

• State v. Urena

Court

• Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Type

• Domestic Case Law

Jurisdiction

• Rhode Island