MARGARET M. ROBILLARD, RESPONDENT, v. DEAN ROBBINS, III ET AL., APPELLANTS.

78 N.Y.2d 1105, 585 N.E.2d 375, 578 N.Y.S.2d 126 (1991).
November 25, 1991

3 No. 234
Decided November 25, 1991

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

James L. Pemberton, for Appellants.
Harold D. Gordon, for Respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While defendants urge that it was error to allow plaintiff's medical expert to express opinions on the very questions to be resolved by the jury, their general objections were insufficient to preserve a law issue for our review (see, Matter of Gonzalez v State Liquor Authority, 30 NY2d 108, 112- 113; Wrightman v Campbell, 217 NY 479, 482-483).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa concur.

MARGARET M. ROBILLARD, RESPONDENT, v. DEAN ROBBINS, III ET AL., APPELLANTS.

78 N.Y.2d 1105, 585 N.E.2d 375, 578 N.Y.S.2d 126 (1991). November 25, 1991

78 N.Y.2d 1105, 585 N.E.2d 375, 578 N.Y.S.2d 126 (1991).
November 25, 1991