George W. Albro, for Appellant.
Myles L. Orosco, for Respondent.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
A party generally must specify the basis for an objection to preserve a question of law for this Court's review. In this case defense counsel made only a general objection to the court's multiple rulings regarding the proposed testimony of a witness. Accordingly, defendant's present contention that the testimony constituted hearsay and improperly bolstered another prosecution witness' testimony has not been preserved for our review.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed in a memorandum. Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa concur. Judge Smith took no part.